Karnataka HC: Right of Any Adult to Marry Any Individual Is a Fundamental Right

Must Read

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was...

Follow us

A Writ Petition came before a Bench of Justices S Sujata and Sachin Shankar Magadum under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Petition was filed for the issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The judgment is an important one as the State of Karnataka is talking to bring a law on Love Jihad.

What is Love Jihad?

Love Jihad is an Islamophobic theory that is a declared action wherein Muslim youth use such fervent appeals, employing charm to lure girls toward conversion by pretending love in some reports, as an organized, funded behaviour. Nevertheless, the shortage of evidence in most cases had mostly drawn it a fabrication of a paranoid fancy. In 2009, the Kerala High Court had ordered the State Police head to find out whether there was a planned campaign to turn Christian and Hindu daughters to Islam by swaying the matrimonial inducement. The inquiry found no definitive evidence to confirm the presence of such a campaign.

Which State has brought law on Love Jihad?

Uttar Pradesh brought a law against ‘love jihad”. A month following the Allahabad High Court remarks that religious conversion for the prospect of conjugality is unacceptable, the Uttar Pradesh Government implemented an ordinance apparently aimed at curbing coercive or deceitful conversions. The Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020 makes conversion non-bailable with up to 10 years of jail time if undertaken unlawfully and requires that religious conversions for marriage in Uttar Pradesh be approved by a district magistrate.

Brief Facts

The Habeas Corpus Petition was filed by Wajeed Khan who sought the release of the girl whom he intends to marry, Ramya G. from the confinement of her parents. The lover was produced by the Courts alongside her parents. 

Ramya recorded her statement in front of the judges that she was living in Mahila Dakshatha Samithi, Vidyaranyapura pursuant to the complaint lodged by her at the Janodaya Santwana Kendra.

She informed the Court that her rights were infringed by her parents because she decided to marry the Petitioner. Both Petitioner and girl worked at IQVIA as software engineers. 

The mother of the Petitioner had no objections to the marriage but Ramya’s parents disapproved of their decision. 

Court’s Observations

The Court emphasised that a person’s right to marry irrespective of caste is his/her fundamental right and is enshrined on the pages of the Constitution. The liberty to create a personal relationship is not allowed to be encroached upon.

Additionally, the Court noted that Ramya was an adult and a software engineer. She could make her own decisions regarding her life and was capable to do so.

Court’s Decision

The Court disposed of the Petition since the Writ was asked to be issued for Ramaya only and she was already present in the Court, recording her submission. Thus, securing her liberty. Additionally, the Court directed Mahila Dakshata Samithi to release her.

Click here to view the Judgement.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

Supreme Court Upheld “Environmental Rule of Law” in NGT Decision to Demolish Illegal Hotel on Forest Land

This case concerns the dispute relating to the additional construction of hotel-cum-restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex along with a bus stand and...

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -