Gujarat HC Questioned the State over the Denial of Midday Meal Benefits to the Children

Must Read

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

Follow us

The Gujarat High Court Bench on Friday, took suo moto cognizance of a news report on the findings of a survey by the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) which said that almost 85% of the parents who have enrolled their children in government school did not receive anything in lieu of the mid-day meals since the lockdown in March.

The bench comprising of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice IJ Vora has termed this issue of the plight of poor students during this pandemic as “very serious” and has also sought an explanation from the State Education Department and the Commissioner of the Mid-Day Meal Scheme about the Mid-Day Meal scheme to the poor children since March.

The Survey was conducted over 357 low-income parents, which revealed that only 15% of the parents received Rice, Wheat, and/or pulses under the scheme, leaving behind the remaining 85% of the households who had enrolled their children in government schools.

As per the survey, since after the lockdown due to the Covid-19 pandemic, 30% of the students were also not found to be engaged in any formal learnings from the school.

Along with these, the court also noticed that more than 40% of the parents with children at private schools are unaware of the State government’s effort for the Flat fee Reduction of 25% which was made during the lockdown period for the sake of public interest. But, despite this relief, 54% of parents were asked to pay the fees and among these, more than half of the parents have faced difficulties in arranging fees and meeting the deadlines. In fact, this is the main reason behind the students dropping out the school, as per the survey.

It was also found in the survey, that only 54% of the families were having TV Sets, and less than 2% had accessed to a laptop and 12% of the families were having access to wi-fi and emails.

The Bench, having noticed the above circumstances, issued notice to the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Gujarat and Commissioner, regarding the Mid-Day Meal Schemes of State of Gujarat. The court stressed that the State’s attention should immediately be drawn to this and said the matter is very serious.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgement from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also contribute blog, articles, story tip, judgment and many more and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -