Gujarat High Court: Caste System Causes Difficulty in Choosing a Life Partner

Must Read

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and...

Follow us

The Gujarat High Court heard a Habeas Corpus petition. It was in the case of Niteshkumar Mulchandbhai Prajapapti v. the State of Gujarat. The petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner requested to produce his wife (Corpus) before the Court.

Background

In the instant case, the couple got married against their family’s wish in January. The petitioner filed Criminal Application No. 997/2020 to protect them from their families. The Court granted the same in February.

However, when a couple moved to Rajasthan, they got separated. Thus, the petitioner moved a petition to produce his pregnant wife before the Court.

Court’s Discussion

The High Court issued an order dated June 9, 2020, to produce the petitioner’s wife. The order issued for petitioner’s wife appeared before the Court through video conferencing. The wife’s family presented her physically at district court at Palanpur. This was done on the Court’s order. The Court observed that the couple is lawfully married. The couple’s marriage is also registered. The Court also took note of the submission of the wife, who expressed her desire to live with her husband. She also told Court that she is pregnant.

Nevertheless, the mother of the wife is adamant and showed her resistance to marriage. She emotionally blackmailed her daughter. She said that if she lives with her husband, she will end her life.

The Court attempted to convince the mother that her daughter is an adult and legally married. She is also carrying a child of the petitioner in her womb. Therefore, she should allow her to join the petitioner. However, she did not listen to the Court and remained adamant. The Court observed that it is difficult for Courts to deal with some issues. The emotional issues which turn into a legal battleground are challenging to deal with.

Court’s Decision

The High Court ordered Additional District Judge of Palanpur to ensure that wife reaches her matrimonial home. The Court also requested the Additional District Judge to draw an amicable solution between the parties. The Additional District Judge can also refer the Case to Mediation Centre.

The two-judge bench of Justices Sonia Gokani and NV Anjaria stated that, the caste system in the country is making it difficult for young people to decide their life partner. The rigidity in the minds of the family becomes the cause of the division of relationship.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -