GN Saibaba’s Bail Opposed by State in Bombay High Court

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

The State Government opposed the bail application that former Delhi University professor GN Saibaba filed before the Bombay High Court. The professor uses a wheelchair due to his disability and is in an Anda cell due to which he requires necessary medical attention. Thus, he is in a separate place and cell which reduces the chances of him contracting Covid-19.

Introduction

Justice ZA Haq and Justice SM Modak of the Nagpur bench were hearing the criminal appeal Saibaba filed last month, seeking suspension of sentence & temporary medical bail due to Covid-19.

The sub-divisional police officer, Gadchiroli at Aheri, filed an affidavit through Special Public Prosecutor K Sathianathan. It stated, “Saibaba is an active member of the Naxalite movement and helping them in their cause. If he is released on bail, he will again contact Naxal persons, and he will conspire with Naxal persons, and it will send the wrong message to society.”

Issues & Arguments

The appeal contends that there are almost 155 positive cases of Covid-19 at Central Prison as per reports. Furthermore, it houses nearly 1800 mates.

The appeal stated that “The place where Applicant is lodged in Central Prison Nagpur, i.e. High-Security Cell/Anda Cell, the infection has made its roadway, despite taking all possible preventive measures by the Respondent. As per the latest reports, there are 155 cases of COVID-19 infection in the Prison alone, which includes inmates, prison staff, and even those who are in high-security cells. It is highlighted herein that the place where the Applicant is lodged in that High-Security Cell or Anda Cell as it is called, also got positive patients, the possibility of community spread in the Prison is only matter of time.”

The lockdown is due to fear of the spread of the virus. Furthermore, additional support was available to Saibaba in the form of medicines, attendants, and regular check-ups. The Applicant suffers from many ailments due to which he requires round the clock attention, assistance, and medication.

The medical issues that the applicant suffers from include:

· Acute pancreatitis, Fatty Liver & Sleep Apnea;

· Blackouts, Dizziness & Spinning Head;

· Difficulty in Urination & Burning Sensation during Urination;

· Formation of a painful lump inside the stomach on the left side;

· The blood flow in urine and motions;

· Quadriplegia and Paralytic attacks;

· Palpitations in chest and stomach & Cyst in the brain.

Therefore, the appeal states that “There is no way Applicant can be given his treatment, without breaching the lockdown conditions and exposing escort staff and Applicant to the risk of the infection. The only way out therefore is to set him at large so that he along with his family and doctors of his choice can deal with his health at their own risk and perils, then to remain completely without any provision.”

Two attendants provided to assist him round the clock. But, they withdrew themselves from offering any services and left on their own will and accord. They were doing this for the past three years without any complaints. Also, the authorities’ attempts to convince them have failed. Hence, they do not wish to support them at any cost.

Court’s Decision

The High Court refused to suspend Saibaba’s sentence. He was convicted and sentenced to life by a Sessions Court on March 7, 2017, under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. The Court found Saibaba to be in association with the Revolutionary Democratic Front (RDF). It held him guilty of conspiring to wage war against India.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -