ED moves Bombay High Court, Seeks Cancellation of Kapil Wadhwan’s Bail

Must Read

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract....

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish...

Follow us

The case

Judge Prakash D Naik through a video-conferencing hearing amidst the situation prevailing in the country, issued a notice to Wadhwan after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) moved the Bombay High Court, by an application seeking the cancellation of his Wadhwan’s bail, for having violated bail conditions and travelling out of Mumbai to Mahabaleshwar, during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Kapil Wadhwan, the Dewan Housing Finance Limited (DHFL) promoter was accused in a money laundering case that involved Iqbal Mirchi, an Indian criminal. The 2013 case in which he was accused is Kapil Wadhwan v. Samsung Electonics. Kapil was arrested in January, this year because of the suspicious dealings with Iqbal Mirchi, who is dead now. While the investigation was still going on, Wadhwan was granted bail in February through a special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The dealings between Mirchi and Wadhwan

According to the ED, Kapil Wadhwan had laundered money from DHFL, for illegal dealings with Mirchi. Rs.12,773 crore was extorted from DHFL on the pretext that one lakh customers required loans. This money was used by Wadhwan to pay Mirchi.

The bail was given on three conditions:

  1. Wadhwan had to appear before the ED for investigation as and when it was required.
  2. He was also restricted from leaving the country without the court’s permission.
  3. Wadhwan was required to surrender his passport to the Investigation Officer (IO) as directed by Special judge Prashant Rajvaidya.

The Sessions Court granted Wadhwan bail in February when Amit Desai, the advocate who appeared for him submitted his company’s transactions proving that it had no relation with Iqbal’s dealings.

The ED had opposed the bail on the following grounds:

  1. Three properties in Worli, that belonged to Iqbal were proceeds of the crime and that Wadhwan might influence the probe if he were to be granted a bail.
  2. The further investigation conducted claimed that the properties belonging to Mirchi were to be bought by a company called Sunblink Real Estate Private Limited which was linked to Dheeraj Wadhwan (Kapil’s brother).
  3. On April 9th, Wadhwan and his family were put in quarantine alleging their travel to Sataria hill-station during the 21-day lockdown period.In light of this, the ED has issued a notice to seize the luxury vehicles and the people who travelled have been booked under Sections of IPC and also under the Disaster Management Act.
  4. Advocate Purnima H Kantharia, appearing for ED claimed that an application to cancel Wadhwan’s bail had been issues in March but had not been followed-up because of the country-wide lockdown.(The hearing was to happen on April 23rd)

The probe agency called for an immediate hearing of the application as the Wadhwan brothers left the city and flout the bail conditions. In the light of the above arguments, Advocate Purnima Katharia appearing for the ED filed an application before the High Court, seeking the cancellation of bail granted to Kapil Wadhwan as he had flout the conditions on which the bail was granted.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against National Stock Exchange For Lack Of Merit

In the case of A. Kumar v. Financial Intelligence Unit & Ors., A. Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

The Federal Appeals Court Holds Trump’s Diversion of Military Funds To Build the Wall To Be Unlawful

The Federal Appeals Court held that US President Donald Trump’s diversion of military funds to build the wall is unlawful. A grey area in the...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Filed Challenging the Judgment of Madras High Court in Ganesan v. State Represented by Its Inspector of Police

An appeal was filed before the Supreme court, challenging the judgment & order of Madras High Court. The Supreme Court upheld the HC judgment...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -