Madras High Court Discards Tamil Nadu’s Decision to Conduct Class 10 Board Exams

Must Read

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years...

Follow us

Madras High Court heard the case for conducting class X Board exams on June 15 by Tamil Nadu’s government. It contended so, as COVID-19 cases may increase to two lakh in the future. It relied on expert opinions as published by news reports.

The respective bench passed no interim order. The matter got adjourned to June 11. The state asked to put forth their view on the issue. Moreover, it directed the government to file a detailed report on all the precautions for conducting exams. 

After the commencement of the hearing, the issue before the Court was, “Whether the government can give an undertaking that no student will get COVID-19 infection if allowed to conduct the exams from June 15?”.

Respondent’s Argument

Advocate General Vijay Narayan, on behalf of the respondent, relied on expert opinions. These were published in news reports. The reports stated that COVID-19 cases could increase to two lakh or even exceed in the coming days. He contended, “therefore, this is the right time to conduct the exams.” 

He also highlighted CBSE’s move to hold Class XII exams. It was submitted that there are over 200 schools affiliated to CBSE in the state, and none of them complained. Arguing further, he said, “We do not know why only the state board schools are a target.” He added, “if not now, it would be difficult to hold them at a later date.”

Court’s observation

The bench asked why Class X students were being forced to write the exams given that the government did not agree to open educational institutions. Until COVID-19 threat reduction, there was no need to make any decisions. 

He requested rescheduling the exams because the lives of more than nine lakh students would be at stake. The request was in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The division bench of justices Vineet Kothari and R Suresh Kumar heard teachers’ association petition. They rejected the government’s decision to hold exams during this pandemic. They restricted the state from moving ahead and conducting exams. 

The Court abstained from putting lives of more than nine lakh students at stake. They differentiated it from opening TASMAC (liquor) shops during the lockdown.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -