Delhi High Court: Service Of Notice to Investigating Officer Or Victim’s Counsel Necessary In Bail Matters

Must Read

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Follow us

The Delhi High Court on Friday issued directions to Sessions Courts in Delhi. The Court said that they should follow the earlier orders passed by the H.C. Therefore, it was on mandating to serve a notice to the complainant/informant/victim in all bail proceedings on POCSO cases.

Brief Facts of the Case

Respondent No. 2 in the petition has filed a bail application seeking interim bail due to his wife’s illness. The Extra Sessions Judge granted bail to the accused of one month. Neither a notice issued nor was he represented at the time of interim bail. The applicant approached the H.C. He highlighted the legal position and prayed for the quashing of the interim bail.

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018 amended Section 439 of the CrPC. The amendment made it mandatory for the informant or any other person authorized by the informant to be present at the time of hearing of an application for bail. The bail was filed by the accused under the provisions of the POCSO Act.

On 24th September 2019, the Delhi H.C. issued “Practice Directions” to ensure compliance with the mandate of Section 439. These directions state that before granting bail in cases of Rape, Gang-rape under the IPC, the High Court or Sessions Court must give notice of the bail application to the Public Prosecutor within 15 days from the date of receiving the bail application. They gave a format for communicating to the informant by the Investigating Officer. The Court must ensure that the Investigating Officer has, in writing, communicated to the informant or any person authorized.

Despite these legal provisions, a notice of bail application was not given to the complainant/informant/victim. Keeping these facts in mind, the Court on 22nd May called for an urgent report from the Registrar General.

Arguments before the Court

Counsel for the Petitioner, Ms Tara Narula submitted that the Sessions Court order granting bail to the respondent is wrong in law. The order was passed without issuing any notice to the complainant. It denied her the opportunity to represent herself. To support this, she relied on the S.C. judgment in UPSC v. Papaiah & Ors. (1997) 7 SCC 614 which held that if the bail order granted is contrary to law, it is liable to be set aside. She cited statutory provisions Section 439 Cr. P.C. and the Practice Directions issued by the H.C.

She further submitted that her Vakalatnama representing the applicant was on record in the Sessions Court. This ruled out any valid reason for the notice of the bail application not issued to her. She also submitted her analysis of 122 bail orders, taken from the E-courts website. It showed that in many matters, courts granted bail without hearing the complainant/informant/victim.

Appearing for the State of Delhi, APP Ms Meenakshi Dahiya, accepted that not giving notice to the victim was erroneous.

Mr Uttam Singh, counsel for the accused submitted that the grant of bail was because his wife had a dental problem requiring urgent surgery. The evidence of all witnesses and the victim concluded. So there is no chance of evidence tampering by the accused.

Court’s Observations

The Court observed no ambiguity about the mandate of law as per the provisions of Cr. P.C., Practice Guidelines, and the orders passed by the High Court. The Courts have to hear the victim/complainant/informant. Furthermore, the Court stated that the procedure in the Practice Guidelines was not followed as the Investigating Officers were not serving the notice to the victim/complainant/informant.

The Court remarked that notice was not served in almost 70% of cases. It was done after analyzing the Registrar Generals report. The H.C. acknowledged that the lockdown period has been challenging for courts. However, the same cannot be a reason for not issuing the notice.

Court’s Decisions

The Court passed the following directions:

– Whenever the accused puts forth the application for regular/interim bail, service of notice to the I.O. or the counsel of the victim is necessary. After receiving the notice, the I.O. has to issue a notice to the victim in the prescribed format. The SHO has to certify the service of notice which along with the status report should be before the Court.

– If the I.O. is not able to trace the victim, he has to record the reasons in the status report. The Court should have a record stating the specific reason the victim’s absence.

– Finally, before proceeding with bail applications, Courts must ensure the service of notice. If not served, they must issue summons to the victim.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

Supreme Court Agrees To Examine Centre’s Plea To Keep Adultery a Crime in Armed Forces

The Centre appealed to the Supreme court on Wednesday, pleading that the 2018 judgment of decriminalizing adultery under IPC must not apply to the armed forces. The Supreme Court in a path-breaking verdict in 2018 decriminalized adultery and declared all its provisions unconstitutional as it diminishes the value of women, but maintained that it continues to be a ground for divorce.

Supreme Court Examines the Pollution in Yamuna River for the Second Time

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made a second attempt to clean the Yamuna river by taking a Suo Moto Cognizance of significantly high levels of ammonia water discharged from neighbouring states like Haryana into Delhi.

Fetus Suffering From Anencephaly, Woman’s Plea To Terminate 28-Weeks Pregnancy Allowed by Delhi HC

Based on the report of the medical board constituted by AIIMS, the Delhi High Court on Monday allowed a petition filed by a woman seeking the termination of her 28-weeks pregnancy. They said in its report that the fetus suffered from anencephaly, a disorder where the skull bone is not developed and was thus incompatible with life, therefore her fetus can be aborted.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -