Delhi High Court Imposes New Conditions On Accused Before Granting Bail

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

A single-judge bench of Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani of the Delhi High Court was formed to hear an application for interim bail by an accused for murder. The accused had sought bail on the ground that he had to attend to his daughter’s medical needs. While bail was granted for 5 weeks, the Court imposed novel conditions. Conditions like Video Calling the Investigating Officer (IO) every day and dropping a pin on Google Maps to verify the location.

Brief Facts of the Case 

The applicant is an undertrial in a case arising from FIR No. 214/2016 registered under Sections 302 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act 1959. He sought bail on medical grounds. The latest nominal role and his medical report dated 06.06.2020 were placed on record. The applicant has been in Judicial Custody since May 2016, as per the nominal roll. The applicant and his daughter, both have eye problems. 

Arguments Before the Court

The counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has a serious cyst in his left eye. The medical report states that he has been referred to various hospitals. That is for better treatment. It was further submitted that the applicant’s problem requires to be addressed by specialist doctors. It was also submitted that the previous report has confirmed his daughter’s eye problem. And that his daughter’s eye problems need urgent correction. And if not done, it may get worse or may never be remedied. The counsel reiterated that the applicant has been an undertrial prisoner for more than 4 years. 

APP Mr. Amit Ahlawat opposed the bail application. He submitted that the applicant’s medical condition is stable. The daughter’s problem is neither urgent nor life-threatening. So no interim bail be granted to the applicant.

Court’s Observations and Decision

On inspecting the facts and circumstances, the Court observed that the daughter of the applicant needs better attention and timely surgery. The Court further observed that with the partial reopening of hospitals for non-urgent treatment and surgery, it would now be possible for the applicant to attend to his daughter’s medical needs. Apart from that, the Court stated that the applicant has been in judicial custody for more than 4 years as an undertrial. He also needs to attend to his own medical problems. 

Thus, the Court was persuaded to grant interim bail to the applicant for 5 weeks. The Court imposed the following conditions:

  1. To furnish a bond of 50,000 with 1 surety.
  2. Not leave the State of Delhi and ordinarily reside in the place of residence stated in the prison records.
  3. Make a video-call every Monday between 11 am and 11:30 am to the Investigating Officer. In case the Investigating Officer is not available, then to the SHO of the Police Station.
  4. The applicant must also ‘drop-a-pin’ on Google Maps, so that the IO/SHO can verify the applicant’s presence and location.
  5. To furnish to the Investigating Officer/ SHO a cell phone number on which the applicant may be contacted. This number must be kept active and ‘switched on’ at all times.
  6. To surrender his passport to the Jail Superintendent.
  7. The applicant shall not contact/visit/threaten the Prosecution Witnesses. He shall not tamper with any evidence and shall not abscond.

Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -