Delhi High Court Disposes of Petition As Petitioner Dies due to Lack of Vacancy in Hospitals

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

On June 5, 2020, the Supreme Court of India heard the plea of Motiram Goyal. The Plea was to seek direction from the Court for his free treatment and accommodation in a government hospital. The plea, was to also make available ventilators for COVID-19 patients.

Brief Facts of the Case

Goyal was an 80-year-old COVID-19 patient facing denial by several hospitals due to lack of vacancies. He passed away before the Delhi High Court could take up his petition. His plea seeks a direction to the government to accommodate him in a government hospital.

Petitioner’s Submission

Advocate RPS Bhatti filed the petition on behalf of the Petitioner. The Petitioner had informed the Court that he fell sick on May 25 and therefore, was taken to Vikas Marg Extension, Delhi. “Due to the negligence of the staff the Petitioner got infected with COVID-19″ the petition stated. His condition began deteriorating after being admitted to the hospital. Hence, he required the aid of a ventilator.

The hospital started pressurizing the Petitioner to shift to some other hospital. Furthermore, the authorities mentioned that they could not treat COVID-19 patients due to lack of equipped and expertise. The plea reads, “The Petitioner further approached various hospitals. The list includes Rajiv Gandhi Hospital, AIIMS, Max at Patparganj, Gangaram Hospital, and Apollo Hospital. Each one of them refused to admit the Petitioner stating lack of vacancy.”

Meanwhile, the Vikas Marg hospital kept charging rates which are far beyond reasonable. The Petitioner claimed that he belonged to the BPL category. Hence, the Petitioner sought a direction from the Court for free treatment. Petitioner also asked for accommodation in a government hospital with a ventilator. Later, the counsel for the Petitioner informed the Court that his client had passed away due to the lack of vacancies in hospitals.

Court’s Order

The Delhi HC Held:

“The counsel for the Petitioner submits that unfortunately, the Petitioner has expired. Thus, the petition has to be rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the petition and the application are disposed of “


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -