Delhi High Court Disposes of Petition As Petitioner Dies due to Lack of Vacancy in Hospitals

Must Read

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Follow us

On June 5, 2020, the Supreme Court of India heard the plea of Motiram Goyal. The Plea was to seek direction from the Court for his free treatment and accommodation in a government hospital. The plea, was to also make available ventilators for COVID-19 patients.

Brief Facts of the Case

Goyal was an 80-year-old COVID-19 patient facing denial by several hospitals due to lack of vacancies. He passed away before the Delhi High Court could take up his petition. His plea seeks a direction to the government to accommodate him in a government hospital.

Petitioner’s Submission

Advocate RPS Bhatti filed the petition on behalf of the Petitioner. The Petitioner had informed the Court that he fell sick on May 25 and therefore, was taken to Vikas Marg Extension, Delhi. “Due to the negligence of the staff the Petitioner got infected with COVID-19″ the petition stated. His condition began deteriorating after being admitted to the hospital. Hence, he required the aid of a ventilator.

The hospital started pressurizing the Petitioner to shift to some other hospital. Furthermore, the authorities mentioned that they could not treat COVID-19 patients due to lack of equipped and expertise. The plea reads, “The Petitioner further approached various hospitals. The list includes Rajiv Gandhi Hospital, AIIMS, Max at Patparganj, Gangaram Hospital, and Apollo Hospital. Each one of them refused to admit the Petitioner stating lack of vacancy.”

Meanwhile, the Vikas Marg hospital kept charging rates which are far beyond reasonable. The Petitioner claimed that he belonged to the BPL category. Hence, the Petitioner sought a direction from the Court for free treatment. Petitioner also asked for accommodation in a government hospital with a ventilator. Later, the counsel for the Petitioner informed the Court that his client had passed away due to the lack of vacancies in hospitals.

Court’s Order

The Delhi HC Held:

“The counsel for the Petitioner submits that unfortunately, the Petitioner has expired. Thus, the petition has to be rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the petition and the application are disposed of “


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -