Calcutta High Court Accepts Plea Against Government Inaction in Funding COVID-19 Vaccines

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

In the case of Kanishk Sinha v Harsh Vardhan & Ors., the petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking government funding for low-cost corona vaccines.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner tried to file a patent for an invention of a vaccine in the patent office. He tried to do it using the online getaway. There was an error on the website hence he could not file the application properly. As a result, he did not receive the patent. 

The petitioner needs to test his vaccine before it can be used on the public. However, he does not have enough funds to hire a private lab. He wanted a government lab with proper security and instruments/apparatus. 

He also required blood samples or swab samples of the Covid-19 affected patients. Most importantly, he needs PPE kits for his research team. Hence, the petitioner needs government funding for his research work.

Arguments of the Petitioner 

The counsel highlighted that Mr Kanishk is a patent holder for various inventions. The Court had approved the said funding in its order on May 8th. Yet, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) refused to give it on May 11. He alleged that the ICMR has dissolved the COVID-19 vaccine research. 

The counsel challenged the inaction of the government authorities. He also asked for a full disclosure of details of the funds allotted. He asked the disclosure of the timeline, procedure, and projects by the Government. Additionally, he asked the current status and success rate of such projects. 

He prayed for a hearing through video conferencing at the time of deciding the instant application. He submitted that it could be done through WhatsApp or Microsoft Team Application, whenever possible

Arguments of the Respondents 

The counsel submitted that the online application for the patent has been accepted. Hence, his petition is partly redressed. 

Further, the government could grant funding after the proper procedure. He asked the petitioner to file an application in the appropriate department for it. 

Court’s Observation

The Court observed that the actions of the respondents were illegal and malafide. It stated that Article 21 protected the rights of the petitioner. By refusing to allow the vaccine, the respondent had caused harm to society. 

The Court also directed the respondent to rescind the order letter issued on 435/Legal Cell/2020, this letter had refused the payment for research to the petitioner. Further, the Court condemned the conduct of ICMR and said that research was for the greater good of society.

As a result, the Court directed the respondents to grant funding for research.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -