Bombay High Court Urges Centre and National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority To Reconsider the Capping Prices of N-95 Masks

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

The Bombay High Court questioned the Centre and National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority. It was regarding the cap on the price of N-95 masks considering the Drug Price Control Order. The Order states that the government will have to ensure the prices. The prices must not be increased by more than 10% of prices prevailing in the preceding 12 months.

Brief Facts of the Case

The NPPA was urged to reconsider its capping price of N-95 mask in the public interest. This reconsideration was urged by Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice SS Shinde. The Division Bench urges this to NPPA in the public interest. It is also ensuring that hoarding, as well as black marketing of these masks, does not take place. The bench directs NPPA to take a proper decision, preferably within ten days but not beyond two weeks.

Issues & Arguments

The Court had heard a PIL filed by Sucheta Dalal and Anjali Damania. They are a journalist and activist, respectively. They sought directions against hoarding, and black marketing of N-95 masks in the State.

Senior Advocate Mihir Desai appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Advocate Mihir Joshi also appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Anil Singh appeared on behalf of the Union of India and NPPA. Anil Singh is the Additional Solicitor General. He submitted that as per Centre’s intervention, NPPA issued an advisory on May 21. It was contended that manufacturers and importers of masks have reduced their prices up to 47%.

The petitioner states that the advisory issued by NPPA failed to implement clause 20. The manufactures of N95 masks allowed to increase prices substantially. She contends that prices bloated to Rs.199 per mask. Even though the average charge of manufacturing was Rs.28.57 per mask, it was no difference that manufacturers were willing to reduce the MRP by close to 50%. This reduction was expected without protest.

Clause 20 of the DPCO states that the government would oversee the MRPs of all the medical devices. That it would ensure that no manufacturer or importer increases the MRP of a drug more than 10% of MRP during the preceding 12 months. Furthermore, where the increase is beyond 10% of MRP, it shall reduce the same to the level of 10% of MRP for the next 12 months.

Assertions in the PIL

The PIL asserts that the petitioners want to get PPE Kits and N-95 masks. The kits and masks are required for distribution amongst the frontline workers in Mumbai. It is to help them during the ongoing crisis. The petitioners were in shock to witness black marketing and profiteering. They further noticed the failure of the State machinery to implement the Order dated March 13, 2020 under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -