Bombay High Court Denies to Pass Orders for Transport of Migrants to West Bengal

Must Read

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Follow us

The Bombay High Court refuses to pass directions facilitating the movement of migrant workers. The migrant workers are to move from the State of Maharashtra to West Bengal. This is due to the pendency of the suo moto case on the migrant’s issue before the SC. 

Introduction

Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Anuja Prabhudessai were hearing a PIL. Centre for Indian Trade Unions and others file PIL. They stated the mob of migrants workers in the State. They are left in strands. Furthermore, they were living in unhygienic conditions during this pandemic.

Reference

The bench refers to the Supreme Court’s order dated July 9. The top court expresses displeasure over the State’s decision. The decision was to file an affidavit in a suo moto case regarding the mob of migrant workers. The court observed:

“On a reading thereof, it appears that the order is specific to the State of Maharashtra. The Hon’ble Supreme Court expressed its displeasure at the State’s reluctance to find out whether there are migrant labourers, stranded in Maharashtra, who are willing to leave for their hometown.” The Supreme Court has sought the State’s response in a detailed affidavit. 

Issues & Arguments 

Senior Advocate Gayatri appears on behalf of the petitioners. She submits that the contention about no demand for Shramik trains is incorrect. Moreover, the Union has got in touch with many migrant workers. Union learnt that there are almost 56,000 labourers. Moreover, they still wish to travel back to their native place. Many of these labourers are from West Bengal, Singh said.

Court’s Decision

The Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court retorted- 

“Do you know the situation in West Bengal? The state government at one point did not permit migrants to return home, we do not want to say anything against anyone, but the situation was not handled properly.” Furthermore, the last train that left for West Bengal did not have too many migrants on board. This was submitted by Advocate General AA Kumbhakoni The next hearing is in the first week of August.

 

Court’s Order

The bench took into consideration the submissions of the Advocate General. The submission includes that the last time a train left for West Bengal did not have too many migrants on board.

“We do not consider it appropriate to pass any order at this stage for facilitating the movement of alleged stranded migrant labourers to West Bengal, as prayed for by Ms Singh, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners. In our view, it would only be appropriate not to dispose of the PIL Petition at this stage and to await further orders that might be passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in respect of migrant labours”, the bench ordered.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -