Punjab And Haryana High Court puts the Bail of Petitioner on Hold due to Lockdown

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

In the High Court of Punjab And Haryana, the present case has been taken up for hearing through video-conferencing, where the bail of the petitioner was kept on hold due to the lockdown and the curfew imposed in the wake of the outbreak of COVID-19. A prayer in the petition has been filed under Section 482 [Saving the inherent power of High Court] Cr.P.C, for:

a) For issuance of appropriate directions to the subordinate judicial authorities and local administration for better coordination.

b) To work according to the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and this Court.

The case of the petitioner was registered under Sections 379 & 411 IPC, at Police Station, Sector 39, Chandigarh. He was granted regular bail by the Additional District Judge, Chandigarh on 19.02.2020. Still further, in another case bearing registered under Section 379-B IPC at Police Station Sadar, Kharar, the petitioner was granted regular bail on 23.03.2020 by the Session Judge, SAS Nagar.

It is, however, stated that the said orders have neither been uploaded nor copies thereof have been provided to the petitioner. It is, thus, pleaded that, in utter ignorance of the orders granting regular bail to the petitioner, he has, till date, not been released on bail.

In this background, the petitioner has besides, making prayer for his release on bail, also prayed for issuance of various other directions:

  1. To issue a reliable channel or contact number/emails to be flashed and circulated among the general public,

  2. To update all the contacts of Judicial Officers on duty on respective days along with their contact numbers/email and address(es) on the official website of the concerned District,

  3. To keep the websites of local administration and subordinate judiciary up-to-date with all the recent developments like updating case status, next business date and uploading or handing over the orders passed before or on the date, the lockdown was announced. etc.

During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner drew the attention of the Court towards the notice uploaded dated 25.03.2020, on the website of the SAS Nagar, which would read as under: –

“Most Urgent notification: As per directions of Hon’ble District and Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar, all officers and staff are directed not to attend court and work from home, in view of restrictions imposed in curfew. No fresh filing would be accepted and if any stay matter or bail application is received at duty officer’s house, he/she may pass appropriate order accordingly, in the matter. Cases, if not taken up yet due to curfew, will be taken up as and when there would be any relaxation in the curfew. In case of any emergency, contact Superintendent/CJM/ ADJ1/ Ldl. District and Session Judge, SAS Nagar Mohali.”

However, no detail of the telephone numbers and emails, of the officers on duties was provided. On account of the outbreak of Pandemic COVID-19, and further taking into consideration the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, all the states were directed to consider releasing some prisoners, who have already been granted bail either by this Court or by the Subordinate Courts on parole, to reduce overcrowding in prisons.

When the situation turns normal, the accused would be bound to furnish surety bonds/bail bonds. In such process, all the District & Sessions Judges, the Directors General of Prisons and the Jail, Superintendents of all the three states of Punjab, Haryana and the U.T., are directed to comply with the directives issued by the Courts.

Punjab & Haryana High Court, Article 30 of Constitution, land acquisition actStill, further, all the authorities shall make a mechanism, clearly providing on their official websites, the contact numbers and e-mails of the CJMs/Duty Magistrates or other Judicial Officers on duties so that the compliance of the orders granting bail or orders passed could be made, before or on the date of lockdown. However, while doing so, there shall be strict compliance of the precautionary measures as circulated by the Court in the wake of Pandemic COVID-19.

A copy of this order to be circulated amongst all for strict compliance.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -