Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Ramesh Kumar to Meet Governor for His Reinstatement as SEC

Must Read

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions,...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by...

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Follow us

Andhra Pradesh High Court asked Nimmagadda Ramesh Kumar to approach Governor Biswa Bhusan Harichandan for appointment as the SEC.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy was hearing the contempt case filed by N. Ramesh Kumar. The High Court is unhappy with the way State Government is dealing with this issue.

Background of the Case

Nimmagadda Ramesh Kumar was ousted from the office of State Election commissioner. The Andhra Pradesh State Government passed an ordinance reducing the tenure of SEC from five to three years. As a result of which, the then SEC was removed.

Additionally, the government made certain changes regarding the qualifications of SEC. Now a retired judge can be qualified to serve as SEC. Accordingly, it appointed ex-Madras High Court Judge as the new SEC. Disappointed by the promulgation of the impugned ordinance, N. Ramesh Kumar knocked the doors of High Court. He challenged the arbitrary ordinance issued by the Government. He also sought for nullifying the ordinance.

The High Court struck down the impugned ordinance, reinstating Dr. Kumar as the SEC. Subsequently, the Court quashed the notification of appointment of ex- Madras High Court judge as new SEC. The Court ruled that the ordinance was actuated by fraud on power. The Court found the impugned ordinance violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

On May 29, the Andhra Pradesh High Court had nullified the impugned ordinance. It ordered for his reinstatement immediately. The government was not satisfied with the order. It moved to Supreme Court and prayed to put a stay on HC order. However, the Supreme Court refused to stay High Court order.

Ramesh Kumar filed contempt petition against Andhra Pradesh government in the High Court. Mr. Kumar alleged that the government has not obeyed Court’s order of his reinstatement as SEC.

The state government promulgated this ordinance due to the ongoing tussle between the State Government and Ramesh Kumar. Dr. Kumar had postponed the local body elections of the state because of COVID-19 pandemic. This made CM unhappy.

Court’s Order

The Court noted that the SC has refused to stay High Court’s order passed on May 29, 2020. Therefore, the government is bound to follow it. It directed Ramesh Kumar to meet the governor for his reinstatement. He has the authority to appoint him as per Article 243(k). Additionally, it asked the state government to file reply as to why it failed to implement its order to call Mr. Kumar back to his office.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -