Andhra Pradesh High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Pitani’s Son

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

Pitani Venkata Suresh and two others had filed anticipatory bail petitions in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. The Court dismissed his petition for anticipatory bail.

Pitani Venkata Suresh is the son of TDP leader and former minister Pitani Satyanarayana. Pitani Venkata Suresh’s name has appeared in the ESI scam. The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) has already arrested TDP MLA K Atchannaidu.

Justice K Lalitha heard the petition.

Background of the Case

Pithani Satyanarayana had become a labour minister in 2017 during TDP rule. It is alleged that both ministers forced ESI officials to buy medical equipment. That was done by substandard companies. ACB asserted that it had collected evidence against both the ministers and Suresh. Fearing his arrest, Suresh approached the High Court requesting for anticipatory bail. Nevertheless, the Court refused to grant Suresh anticipatory bail.

According to the reports, Venkata Suresh is involved in the ESI scam. Mr Suresh has been accused of collecting a 10% commission to sanction any work.

The ACB is investigating Ravi Kumar and Ramesh who had been then administrators of ESI. During Satyanarayana’s tenure as Labor Minister, the administrators denied the allegations in opposition to him that he had ordered an inquiry into Ravikumar Ramesh.

Respondent’s Arguments

MS Subhani made representation on behalf of ACB (Anti-corruption Bureau). The counsel for ACB alleged that petitioners are involved in the scam. Therefore they want to get more information from them for their investigation. The council stressed that after the arrest of petitioners, more things could come to their knowledge. Thus, Subhani argued that anticipatory bail should not be granted to the petitioners. Furthermore, that is because the case is still under investigation.

Court’s Order

Justice Lalitha heard the matter. After hearing ACB counsel, the Court agreed with her arguments. The Court dismissed the petitioner’s plea for an anticipatory bail in the ESI scam case. This is quite shocking for Venkata Suresh who hopefully knocked the doors of Andhra Pradesh High Court. Unfortunately, the Court refused to grant him anticipatory bail. This is an indication that he can be arrested by ACB for investigation in the scam.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -