Andhra Pradesh HC Upheld SEC decision to postpone Elections due to COVID-19 Pandemic

Must Read

Clash of Egos and a Mute Child Victim: India’s Need for International Parental Child Abduction Laws

“Leave your pride, ego, and narcissism somewhere else. Reactions from those parts of you will reinforce your children’s most...

Supreme Court Denies Stay on the Investigation Plea by Rhea Chakraborty

The Supreme Court recently received a petition that sought a stay on the investigation by Bihar Police. It also...

Plea Against the Merger of 6 BSP MLAs in Congress Dismissed by Rajasthan HC

The move comes amidst the ongoing political crisis in the state, with Pilot and 18 MLA in total who...

Former State Election Commissioner, N Ramesh Kumar being shunned by the Ruling government this week, approached the High Court on Sunday. The SEC argued the unconstitutionality of the Ordinance which cut short the five-year tenure of SEC. The petition also challenged the appointment of retired Madras High Court Judge V Kanagaraj in his place.

The Ordinance was a result of a near month long row after the SEC Ramesh Kumar postponed the local body elections as a precaution to the ongoing COVID-19 crisis. This decision resulted in an angry reaction from the YSRCP government, which accused him of acting in favour of the opposition Telugu Desam Party (TDP).

The Governor issued an ordinance on Friday amending the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. The ordinance reduced the term of SEC to three years while adding a provision of re-appointment after three years. This abruptly ended the term of Ramesh Kumar who was appointed in 2016. The Ordinance further changed the eligibility of SEC while adding the requirement of having had an office of the Judge at a High Court.

The Chief Minister, Jagan Mohan Reddy personally met the Governor on March 14, and slammed the SEC for his unilateral decision while claiming to have acted in favour of the opposition party.

Ramesh Kumar argued in court that the decision was arbitrary with the intention to shunt him from the post and the Government did not give any clear reasons for doing so. He also stated that this was nothing short of ‘encroaching’ upon the independence that the Election Commission is guaranteed as a constitutional body.

The High Court upheld the decision of Ramesh Kumar to postpone the elections owing to the rapid spread of COVID-19 pandemic. With the nationwide lockdown, a local body election at this point would further enable people to gather in groups and transmit the virus. The Supreme Court upheld the decision as well although it relaxed the poll code until further announcement.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Clash of Egos and a Mute Child Victim: India’s Need for International Parental Child Abduction Laws

“Leave your pride, ego, and narcissism somewhere else. Reactions from those parts of you will reinforce your children’s most...

Supreme Court Denies Stay on the Investigation Plea by Rhea Chakraborty

The Supreme Court recently received a petition that sought a stay on the investigation by Bihar Police. It also asked the protection to the...

Plea Against the Merger of 6 BSP MLAs in Congress Dismissed by Rajasthan HC

The move comes amidst the ongoing political crisis in the state, with Pilot and 18 MLA in total who are up in arms against...

Supreme Court: Delhi University to Declare Result of Law Student Which Was Withheld

The Supreme Court received a petition that sought declaration of the result of a law student. The result was withheld because of short attendance...

Himachal Pradesh High Court: Normal Rule Is of Bail, and Not Jail

The Petitioner in the case of, Partap Singh and others v State of Himachal Pradesh, was allegedly involved in the illegal possession of drugs. The...

More Articles Like This