Criminal Proceeding Quashed Against The Overnight Internet Sensation Priya Prakash Varrier

Must Read

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Follow us

The Supreme Court stayed all the criminal proceedings, past and future against Priya Prakash Varrier, Malayalam actress.

The Malayalam actress Priya Prakash Varrier, who became an internet sensation overnight with a wink, has finally found breathing space, due to the Supreme Court quashing the criminal proceeding against her and the director of the upcoming movie, “Oru Adaar Love”

Case Facts:

A writ petition was preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner, namely the actress, producer and director of the movie have prayed for quashing of the FIR No. 34 of 2018, dated 14.02.2018 registered at Falaknama Police Station, Hyderabad, Telangana. Apart from that, a request has been also made that no further FIR should be entertained or any complaint under section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code should be dealt because of the picturization of the song ‘Manikya Malaraya Poovi’, by petitioner no. 1 in the film, namely “Oru Adaar Love”.

The petitioner said that the said that the song has been sung in various part of Kerela since 1978 and the said song is a version of a traditional Muslim song from the Malabar region of Kerela and the petitioner cannot be held liable for the song being sung in the film which is yet to be released.

The FIR in the matter has been lodged by the intervenor, namely M.A. Muqeetk Khan.

Issue:

The allegation in the Fir is that the song offends the sentiments of a particular community. The FIR has been lodged for an offence under Section 295A of The Indian Penal Code.

The main issue here was whether the Section 295A IPC would get attracted to the obtaining fact situation.

It is worthy to note that the constitutional validity of the said provision was assailed before the court in the case of Ramji Lal Modi v State of U.P.

Judgment:

The SC observed “we perceive that the intervenor who was an informant in the FIR No. 34 of 2018, in all possibility has been done to gain a mileage from FIR. What is urged before us is that Picturisation which involves the actresses with a wink is blasphemous. Barring that there is no other allegation. Such an allegation, even if it is true, would not come within the ambit and sweep of Section 295A IPC as has been explained in Ramji Lal Modi case. We allow the writ petition and quash the FIR No. 34 of 2018 and we also direct that no FIR under Section 154 or any complaint under section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be entertained against the petitioner because of the Picturisation of the Song.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -