Supreme Court has given its decision for the much-awaited verdict in the Ayodhya land dispute of the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case. In a unanimous judgment, the court has ruled in favour of a Ram Mandir.
The Supreme Court has pronounced a landmark judgment in Ayodhya land dispute case which will have sweeping effects. The five-judge bench of Supreme Court led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi pronounced a unanimous judgment in favour of the Ram Janmabhoomi and said that Ram Mandir will be constructed at the controversial site and Muslims are given an alternate five-acre land for their Mosque.
The Supreme Court heard the long-pending Ayodhya land dispute for a period of 40 days at a stretch and pronounced the historic verdict on Saturday as the nation waited with bated breath.
10 key takeaways from the landmark judgment in the Ayodhya Babri Masjid Case:
- Supreme Court has granted the entire 2.77 acres of disputed land in Ayodhya to deity Ram Lalla.
- Supreme Court has directed the Centre and Uttar Pradesh government to allot an alternative 5-acre land to the Muslims at a prominent place to build a mosque.
- The court has asked Centre to consider granting some kind of representation to Nirmohi Akhara in setting up of the trust. Nirmohi Akhara was the third party in the Ayodhya dispute.
- The Supreme Court dismissed the plea of Nirmohi Akhara, which was seeking control of the entire disputed land, saying they are the custodian of the land.
- Supreme Court has directed the Union government to set up a trust in 3 months for the construction of the Ram Mandir at the disputed site where Babri Masjid was demolished in 1992.
- The Supreme Court said the underlying structure below the disputed site at Ayodhya was not an Islamic structure, but the ASI has not established whether a temple was demolished to build a mosque.
- The court also said that the Hindus consider the disputed site as the birthplace of Lord Ram while the Muslims also say the same about the Babri Masjid site.
- The court also said that the faith of the Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the disputed site where the Babri Masjid once stood cannot be disputed.
- The Supreme Court also said that the 1992 demolition of the 16th century Babri Masjid mosque was a violation of the law.
- While reading out its judgment, the Supreme Court said that the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board has failed to establish its case in Ayodhya dispute case and Hindus have established their case that they were in possession of outer courtyard of the disputed site.
Contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now
