Liberalization and the power structure

Must Read

Dear PM Modi, Are you telling Muslims to leave India?

Today I called my housemaid in India and inquired about her well-being. Her first response was: ‘Ye log Musalaman...

Re-establishing Diplomatic Ties between India and Libya

In view of the prevailing travel ban to Libya by the government of India imposed in 2016, the Union...

Female Genital Mutilation: A Yearning for Culpability in India

A girl was happy that today her mother offered to take her to the movies. This 7-year old girl...

Haj Subsidy Ban and Secular Character of Constitution

For long, the Indian state has practiced the unconstitutional sin of opting for Haj subsidy to continue. For long,...

Instant Triple Talaq and Criminalization of it: Stifling the Rights of Individuals

What instant Triple talaq is to ‘Muslim wives’, criminalization of it is to ‘Muslim husbands’. The former has been sacredly...

Taj Mahal in Storm of History and Propaganda

The radiance of Taj Mahal, at the moment, is blurred not by deterioration in climatic conditions but by the...

Follow us

Rule of Law is the basis of every free and civilised society. One of the major theses of this doctrine is the recognition of right to life and personal liberty as “inheres in the body of every living person.” It has, thus, been confirmed by the popular scholarship on the Indian Constitution that Article 21 does not, in fact, “confer” but confirms this inalienable right.  Even in the absence of this Fundamental Right, the State could not forego the basic sanctity of life and personal liberty. This doctrine subverts the idea of State having the power to suspend the Right to Life and Personal Liberty on occasions of emergency. In the light of this realisation, where do we place Emergency laws that seem to self-sustain the State’s right to overlook the basic fundamental rights of a given population just because they do not toe the line of “neo-liberals”; that overstep the line of “discretionary powers,” and largely qualify arbitrariness?

Arguably, the roots of such extension of power to the State to label any area as “disturbed” lies largely in the economic reforms that took place in 1991 in India. The reforms which came with the basic aims of Liberalization, Globalization and Privatization; have over-all been bitter sweet per se, in the past 25 years. We’ve had better opportunities clubbed with the internal tension of domestic players, better relations with the outside world along with the poor brethren struggling to make ends meet back home. We have had competitive individuals among us working for surplus accumulation, along with “development dissenters” and “seccessionists” in the heart land of our own country fighting for the most basic rights to life and personal liberty. We have seen improvements in international trade, Balance of Payments, skill and expertise of domestic traders, etc. However, the tricky part here is that, “Though the eventual and ideal objective of liberalisation is to reduce the state’s role in economic life, ironically, it is only the state which can reduce the functions of the state.”This fosters the idea that, “the neo-liberal subject cannot be taken as given. Instead, the subject’s mental landscape and consciousness has to be reshaped to secure and procreate the altered economic structure and mode of governance being put in place by reforms.”. For this, whoever disagrees with the “neo-liberal” narrative is casually labelled as an “anti-development maniac” who has neither the will nor the calibre to participate in the competitive global market. And hence, “The palpable violence against the world of the third is projected as necessary for initiating long-run liberation of the embedded subjects from their own “backward” structures that hold them down. Because the Dalits and particularly Adivasis reside in these areas, they have been subjected to the process of land alienation, dislocations, forced evictions, and displacements. However, what appears as progressive from the perspective of global capital (or the third world) may appear as unjust violence and plunder from the perspective of world of the third, which in turn can and did produce countrywide resistance; the last 25 years have been witness to such resistances and the effort of state–capital nexus to manage and navigate this process.” .This supposed “necessity” to commit excesses against the “third World”, in order to make them submit to the system, legitimizes laws that confer indiscriminate powers that overlook the basic tenets of constitutionalism. Emergency laws like AFSPA find a place in our legal system owing to this holier-than-thou approach. The internal tension has only increased.

Keeping all the good that these reforms have brought about, this aspect of subtly expanding the power of the State’s autonomy does not go well in constitutional democracies. States of Jammu and Kashmir and that of the North-East bear testimony to the fact that the experiences of people under such arbitrary laws are completely disregarded and institutionalised crimes have managed to put their life and personal liberty at stake. Furthermore, the substructure of economic crises in families due to illegal detentions, killings and disappearances;  and the superstructure of military expenditure by the State on such wars in the name of ‘defence’; has eventually led to disparity in the overall economic structure of India.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -