Liberalization and the power structure

Must Read

Dear PM Modi, Are you telling Muslims to leave India?

Today I called my housemaid in India and inquired about her well-being. Her first response was: ‘Ye log Musalaman...

Re-establishing Diplomatic Ties between India and Libya

In view of the prevailing travel ban to Libya by the government of India imposed in 2016, the Union...

Female Genital Mutilation: A Yearning for Culpability in India

A girl was happy that today her mother offered to take her to the movies. This 7-year old girl...

Haj Subsidy Ban and Secular Character of Constitution

For long, the Indian state has practiced the unconstitutional sin of opting for Haj subsidy to continue. For long,...

Instant Triple Talaq and Criminalization of it: Stifling the Rights of Individuals

What instant Triple talaq is to ‘Muslim wives’, criminalization of it is to ‘Muslim husbands’. The former has been sacredly...

Taj Mahal in Storm of History and Propaganda

The radiance of Taj Mahal, at the moment, is blurred not by deterioration in climatic conditions but by the...

Follow us

Rule of Law is the basis of every free and civilised society. One of the major theses of this doctrine is the recognition of right to life and personal liberty as “inheres in the body of every living person.” It has, thus, been confirmed by the popular scholarship on the Indian Constitution that Article 21 does not, in fact, “confer” but confirms this inalienable right.  Even in the absence of this Fundamental Right, the State could not forego the basic sanctity of life and personal liberty. This doctrine subverts the idea of State having the power to suspend the Right to Life and Personal Liberty on occasions of emergency. In the light of this realisation, where do we place Emergency laws that seem to self-sustain the State’s right to overlook the basic fundamental rights of a given population just because they do not toe the line of “neo-liberals”; that overstep the line of “discretionary powers,” and largely qualify arbitrariness?

Arguably, the roots of such extension of power to the State to label any area as “disturbed” lies largely in the economic reforms that took place in 1991 in India. The reforms which came with the basic aims of Liberalization, Globalization and Privatization; have over-all been bitter sweet per se, in the past 25 years. We’ve had better opportunities clubbed with the internal tension of domestic players, better relations with the outside world along with the poor brethren struggling to make ends meet back home. We have had competitive individuals among us working for surplus accumulation, along with “development dissenters” and “seccessionists” in the heart land of our own country fighting for the most basic rights to life and personal liberty. We have seen improvements in international trade, Balance of Payments, skill and expertise of domestic traders, etc. However, the tricky part here is that, “Though the eventual and ideal objective of liberalisation is to reduce the state’s role in economic life, ironically, it is only the state which can reduce the functions of the state.”This fosters the idea that, “the neo-liberal subject cannot be taken as given. Instead, the subject’s mental landscape and consciousness has to be reshaped to secure and procreate the altered economic structure and mode of governance being put in place by reforms.”. For this, whoever disagrees with the “neo-liberal” narrative is casually labelled as an “anti-development maniac” who has neither the will nor the calibre to participate in the competitive global market. And hence, “The palpable violence against the world of the third is projected as necessary for initiating long-run liberation of the embedded subjects from their own “backward” structures that hold them down. Because the Dalits and particularly Adivasis reside in these areas, they have been subjected to the process of land alienation, dislocations, forced evictions, and displacements. However, what appears as progressive from the perspective of global capital (or the third world) may appear as unjust violence and plunder from the perspective of world of the third, which in turn can and did produce countrywide resistance; the last 25 years have been witness to such resistances and the effort of state–capital nexus to manage and navigate this process.” .This supposed “necessity” to commit excesses against the “third World”, in order to make them submit to the system, legitimizes laws that confer indiscriminate powers that overlook the basic tenets of constitutionalism. Emergency laws like AFSPA find a place in our legal system owing to this holier-than-thou approach. The internal tension has only increased.

Keeping all the good that these reforms have brought about, this aspect of subtly expanding the power of the State’s autonomy does not go well in constitutional democracies. States of Jammu and Kashmir and that of the North-East bear testimony to the fact that the experiences of people under such arbitrary laws are completely disregarded and institutionalised crimes have managed to put their life and personal liberty at stake. Furthermore, the substructure of economic crises in families due to illegal detentions, killings and disappearances;  and the superstructure of military expenditure by the State on such wars in the name of ‘defence’; has eventually led to disparity in the overall economic structure of India.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -