The Bombay High Court observed that there was no prohibition by the Centre imposed on the state for carrying out door to door Covid-19 vaccination for the elderly and disabled.
Excerpt In this case, the Petitioners sought the regularization of their services on the posts on which they were working on a contract basis. The
A single-judge bench of Justice R. Raghunandan Rao released the suspended judicial officer by granting him bail, who had earlier expressed his displeasure about the working of the government and was booked under sections 124A, 153, 153A of IPC.
The two judges bench in Delhi High Court examined the allegations made against a student activist and an accused who was arrested for being involved in the Citizenship Amendment Act protests in Delhi which were known as the 2020 Delhi Riot.
The Petitioner had challenged an order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Saket Courts, Delhi, under section 482 of CrPC, which granted bail to two accused and exempted the other accused from appearance.
The present case is about a complaint filed by the employees of the society about the embezzlement of funds from the Provident Fund account by the appellant.
The Plaintiff in the said case has filed a case claiming that the arrears on electricity charges are not sustainable in law and violates the principles of natural justice.
Plaintiff has filed this petition against the certificate requesting the presence of concerned officers for construction of Receiving Station under PMDP Urban Scheme and against the claim over the State land falling in Khasra No.96.
Case Excerpt This petition is for a directive from 07.05.2002 to the Respondents to install the RT-PCR equipment at Civil Hospital in Lunglei, which was
Introduction The court stated that the learned trial judge erroneously convicted the appellants under Section 498A/304B/34 IPC and wrongly placed the onus on an inadmissible
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
