High Court Archives

In Krishan Kumar v SDM Rohini, Delhi High Court ruled that if there is a wrongful purchase of the e-court fee or if the submitted fee is not utilized, the same should be refunded by the authorities, without insisting on any kind of court order.

The present petition challenged the vires of various provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and sought a direction to GST officers to comply with the mandatory procedure under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 for valid commencement of the investigation.

PIL was filed challenging the vires of Section 36(2)(a) of the West Bengal Clinical Establishments Act, 2017, which deals with the appointment of the chairperson. Here, the complaint was that a High court judge being the chairperson of West Bengal Clinical Establishments is unconstitutional, but the Court held otherwise.

In the case of Sandwip Kumar Bhattacharya v. The State of West Bengal & Others. The petitioner filed a case claiming disbursement of his pension

Bombay High Court Holds that Seizure of Imported Goods Must Be Supplemented With Reasons To Believe on Reasonable Grounds Rather Than on Mere Suspension or Subjective Presumption.

Here the Delhi High Court permits to make certain amendments in the Statement of Defense with a matter concerning Equitable Set-Off through looking at precedents.

In this case, the Court directed that in light of the principle of law laid down by the Supreme Court, that the recovery of an amount from the retiral dues of the petitioner was illegal.

Karnataka High Court holds that General Elections of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike/Municipal Corporation are to be Held by State Election Commission Within Six Weeks From Publication of Final Reservation Notification.

The criminal appeal no.249 of 2020 is filed by accused no.1 and 2 and other criminal appeal no.252 of 2020 is filed by accused no.3

Madhya Pradesh High Court upholds the Principle of Natural Justice stating that it needs to be followed after serving show cause notice.