Sri Balram Chowdhury was found guilty under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981. He was sentenced to pay Rs 1 Lakh to Manik Debnath. The other partner of the company Amiya Gopal Das was also convicted of the offence, but he paid the particular fine.
Petitioner has challenged impugned order dated passed by Judge, Family Court, Kailashahar. Declining to grant maintenance allowance to the petitioner and her daughter.
The Petitioner filed this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The Petitioner requested the Hon’ble Court to appoint an independent Arbitrator to solve the dispute between the parties.
Facts A Perpetual Lease Agreement was entered into between M/s. Jayna Plastic Works through its proprietor Mr Vir Anil Jain and the Hon’ble President of
In the present case, the court was hearing certain petitions filed by the Petitioners over the issues of shortage of oxygen for treating seriously ill COVID patients; black-marketing of oxygen cylinders; the testings, and infrastructure. Further, during the hearing, the Court was notified about the detention of four cryogenic tankers on their way to the national capital by the Rajasthan government. Pulling up the State of Rajasthan for this detention, the Delhi High Court observed that any interference in the Central Government’s plan for supplying medical oxygen in the Country would “tantamount to endangering hundreds of human lives, if not more.”
The Government of NCT of Delhi issued an order on 25.04.2021 stating that at the request of the High Court of Delhi 100 beds were set aside at Ashoka Hospital. The High Court upon seeing news articles and media reports about the same inquired.
A writ petition was allowed by Karnataka High Court on 22nd April, appealing under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act to set aside an order dated 16th June 2017 by a learned Single Judge. Earlier, the appellants challenged the order of the State Government dated 18th June 2014 regarding the verification of the linguistic minority status of an educational institute.
Excerpt The case revolves around a student seeking admission to Delhi University, which was rejected due to a typographical error. Brief Facts The Petitioner cleared
Excerpt On 30th December 2019 the learned trial Judge while acquitting Accused No. 2 (A-2) and Accused No. 3 (A-3) for the offences punishable under
Excerpt The single bench of Justice SG Chattopadhyay gave the verdict in Crl. Rev. P. No. 07 of 2019. The court ordered maintenance for a
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
