High Court Archives

The present petition filed by Mr Akshay Vinod Kulkarni whose passport was suspended by the Indian Consulate in Houston USA. 

The petition was filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction upon the court to accept the personal bond and two sureties in one criminal case treating the same for all the 9 criminal cases.

This writ petition was filed in the Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand challenging the order passed by Appellate Authority/Deputy Chief Labor Commissioner (Central), Dehradun under Section 7(7) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

The petitioner filed a petition in the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir challenging the bid on behalf of the Lt. Governor of the Union Territory.

This Regular First Appeal was directed against the Award, passed by the Court of learned District Judge Mandi, H.P., about petition No.4 of 2005, titled as Manish Bhatia vs. State of H.P. & another, decided on 06.12.2011.

This case revolves around the applicability of Sections 227 and 228 of the CrPC. The Respondents, in this case, alleged that the Trial Court had conducted a mini-trial at the stage of framing of charges which was not permissible. 

On 6.05.2021, the Karnataka High Court had passed a judgment on a matter filed via Regular First Appeal against the order passed by a lower court regarding the recovery of money. The court exclaimed that the Courts could not encourage “sophistry” and “hairsplitting” while discussing the without prejudice rule. 

The division bench of Chief Justice Akil Kureshi and Justice S. Talapatra passed an order in WP(C)(PIL) No.9/2020. The court ordered the state government to take care of the health of prison inmates and children of orphanages. 

Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the group of petitioners are cross petitions preferred by the employers and employees in the present group of petitions, where all the appeals preferred by the employers are dismissed, and those preferred by the employees are allowed partly in the above terms.

Petitioner’s application for the recognition of its integrated BA/B.ED /B.SC. B.ED program was rejected.