Libertatem Magazine

Vrinda Katoch

Vrinda Katoch

Tahsildar Cannot Expect Petitioner To Produce Documents to His Satisfaction When There Is Document Recorded by Competent Authorities in Service Book: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single-judge bench of Justice M. Venkata Ramana gave orders on the Writ Petition no. 7803 of 2021. The Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner challenging the actions of the 3rd Respondent- Tahsildar, of rejecting the application made by the Petitioner for the issuance of a family

Read Article »

Any Dispute Regarding Incorrect Calculation of Land by Revenue Authorities To Be Brought Before Arbitrator by Filing Application Under Section 3H(5) of National Highways Act, 1956: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Battu Devananda passed an order in Writ Petition no. 5662 of 2021 in Kottapalli Prabhavathi vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh.  Petitioner had filed the writ petition aggrieved by incorrect calculation of the value of land belong to Petitioner by the revenue

Read Article »

Andhra Pradesh High Court Says There Is No Need Of Interference in Orders of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Directs Petitioner To Reinstate Respondent With Back Wages

Excerpt A Division judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Joymalya Baghchi and Sri Justice M. Ganga Rao dismissed the Writ Petition no. 21123 of 2012. The Petitioner in this Writ Petition had challenged the orders passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal setting aside the termination order against the applicant

Read Article »

Andhra Pradesh High Court States That the Threat Dispossession Being a Serious Matter Should Be Heard as Immediately as Possible and Appropriate Orders Need To Be Passed

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice D.V.S.S. Somayajulu gave orders on the Writ Petition no. 3723 of 202. The writ petition was filed by the Petitioners challenging the behaviour of Respondent no. 2 – The Additional Agent to the government and project officer, where there was inaction on

Read Article »

Other Remedies Under CrPC To Be Exhausted Before Filing a Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Police Fail To Register the FIR: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy gave orders on the writ petition no. 5663 of 2021 in Lingam Seetharamayya v. State of Andhra Pradesh. The Petitioner in this writ petition seeks directions against the actions of the police who did not lodge their report as an

Read Article »

Andhra Pradesh High Court Directed the State To Dispose of an Appeal Contesting the Confiscation of a Vehicle as Expeditiously as Possible To Prevent the Vehicle From Being Spoiled Due To Non-Use

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Battu Devananda gave orders on the writ petition no. 6535 of 2021 in L Ramesh v. The State of Andhra Pradesh. The writ petition was filed against the action of Respondent No. 3 – The Commissioner, in not considering an appeal filed

Read Article »

Andhra Pradesh HC Directed the Tribunal To Give Reasonable Time To the Petitioner To Make His Submissions and Dismissed the Writ Petition

A single-judge bench consisting of Justice R. Raghunandan Rao gave orders on the writ petition no. 5874 of 2021 in Sri. Mandapati Ramalingeswara Rao vs state of Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner filed the writ petition seeking a direction against the actions of Respondent No. 3 and 4 in filing O.A. No. 502 of 2020 before the A.P. endowment tribunal under section 83 of Endowment Act, 1987 as violative and contrary to the judgment of the High Court.  

Read Article »

Andhra Pradesh HC Directed the Tribunal To Give Reasonable Time To the Petitioner To Make His Submissions and Dismissed the Writ Petition

A single-judge bench consisting of Justice R. Raghunandan Rao gave orders on the writ petition no. 5874 of 2021 in Sri. Mandapati Ramalingeswara Rao vs state of Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner filed the writ petition seeking a direction against the actions of Respondent No. 3 and 4 in filing O.A. No. 502 of 2020 before the A.P. endowment tribunal under section 83 of Endowment Act, 1987 as violative and contrary to the judgment of the High Court.  

Read Article »