Vrinda Katoch

Andhra Pradesh High Court Decides With Regard to Criminal Petition Pending Before the ACB Court

A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Kongara Vijayalakshmi passed orders on the Writ Petition no. 9425 of 2021. The Writ Petition was filed by the Petitioner declaring the actions of the Respondent in not disposing Petitioners appeal no....

In Case of Illegal Excavation/ Transportation in Prohibited Areas, Person Will Be Penalized: Andhra Pradesh High Court 

EXCERPT A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Battu Devananda gave orders on the Writ Petition no. 9604 of 2021. The Writ was filed under article 226 of the constitution seeking to issue Writ of Mandamus against the actions of...

Andhra Pradesh High Court Says That Before Exhausting the Remedy Available Under Rule 35(A) Of the APMMC, The Writ Petition Cannot Be Filed Before...

A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Battu Devananda gave orders on the writ petition no. 9035 of 2021. The writ petition was filed against the demand notice no. 4352/Q/2009 issued by Respondent no. 3 (The deputy director of mines and geology) demanding to pay a sum of Rs. 83,12,130 towards the normal seigniorage fees, a penalty of Rs. 8,17,23,150, DMF of Rs. 24,93,639 and the merit of Rs. 1,66,243, for unauthorized excavation and transportation of road metal and building stone without obtaining the dispatch permits.

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Earlier Judgement Stating Tobacco Does Not Fall Within Definition of “Food” and Police Does Not Have Any Jurisdiction To...

A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice R. Raghunandan Rao passed an order in Criminal Petition no. 2620 of 2021. The Petitioner is booked for the offences under sections 188, 273, 420, 120(B) IPC and section 58, 59, 63 of FSSA (Food security and safety act), 2006 because the Petitioner was caught storing tobacco and tobacco products. The Petitioner who is facing such charges had approached the Court for relief.

Mere Payment of the Challans Do Not Give Petitioner the Right To State That the License of the Mill Is Extended, Proper Application Must...

Excerpt A single judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice D.V.S.S. Somayajulu passed an order on the Writ Petition no. 5482 of 2019 and 288356 of 2014. The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the orders issued in 2014 requesting him...

Impugned Final Notice Passed Without Considering Explanation of Petitioner Is Liable To Be Set Aside With Direction to Respondents To Consider Explanation: Andhra Pradesh...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy passed an order in the Writ Petition no. 8466 of 2021. The Writ Petition was filed by the Petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 31.03.2021 issued by the 2nd...

Principles of Natural Justice Are Violated When Petitioner Was Not Furnished Documents Specifically Requested and Were Not Given Opportunity for Personal Hearing On Matter:...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Battu Devananda gave orders on the Writ Petition no. 6769 of 2020. The Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner against the proceedings issued by the 3rd Respondent (Deputy Commissioner of...

Tahsildar Cannot Expect Petitioner To Produce Documents to His Satisfaction When There Is Document Recorded by Competent Authorities in Service Book: Andhra Pradesh High...

Excerpt A single-judge bench of Justice M. Venkata Ramana gave orders on the Writ Petition no. 7803 of 2021. The Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner challenging the actions of the 3rd Respondent- Tahsildar, of rejecting the application...

Any Dispute Regarding Incorrect Calculation of Land by Revenue Authorities To Be Brought Before Arbitrator by Filing Application Under Section 3H(5) of National Highways...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Battu Devananda passed an order in Writ Petition no. 5662 of 2021 in Kottapalli Prabhavathi vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh.  Petitioner had filed the writ petition aggrieved by incorrect calculation of the...

Andhra Pradesh High Court Says There Is No Need Of Interference in Orders of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Directs Petitioner To Reinstate Respondent With...

Excerpt A Division judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Joymalya Baghchi and Sri Justice M. Ganga Rao dismissed the Writ Petition no. 21123 of 2012. The Petitioner in this Writ Petition had challenged the orders passed by the Andhra Pradesh...

About Me

41 POSTS
0 COMMENTS
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Andhra Pradesh High Court Allows Writ Petition for Appointment of Vice-Chancellor at Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University in Accordance With Law

On 7.05.2021, the Andhra Pradesh High Court had heard the Writ Petition via Video Conferencing on the subject of issuing a Quo Warranto contending that the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor at Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University(JNTU) was void ab initio. The PIL was allowed by the court. 
- Advertisement -

Petition Before Andhra Pradesh High Court Points Out Irregularities Which Vitiate Fair and Free Elections To Various Divisions of Eluru Municipal Corporation

The writ petition made directing the respondents to rectify the errors and illegalities pointed out by the petitioners, before issuing a notification to conduct fair and free elections in Eluru Municipal Corporation without waiting for a copy of this order, as requested by the Learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration, to proceed with the process of rectification of errors in Electoral Roll of Eluru Municipal Corporation.

Sikkim High Court: Vehicular Accident Victim Forced to settle for Lesser Compensation Than Initial Claim

Petitioner has filed a complaint claiming monetary compensation against the accident in which she was the victim. The High Court of Sikkim modified the claims and by the tribunals and finalized the amount at Rs. 8,30,059.43.

The High Court of Gauhati Acknowledges Problem in Appointment of Legal Officials

Introduction A writ petition has been filed by several petitioners upon the improper transfer of their posts as Additional Public Prosecutor to the respondents Facts of...

High Court of Sikkim Cancels Appointment of Petitioner For Post of Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial Magistrate Due to Non-Disclosure of Criminal Case

Invoking the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court of Sikkim cancelled the appointment of the Petitioner on the post of Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate due to non-disclosure of facts.