Vishal Mandal

On May 8, the division bench of Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar directed various authorities to take action as the matter concerns non-COVID patients who are under treatment. Observation of the Court Advocate Darpan Wadhwa who is appearing on behalf of the petitioner raised four contentions- First contention

On May 8, the High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution seeking immediate relief for the Rohingya families who alleged to have been denied various relief packages announced by the Government of Delhi to combat the COVID-19. The writ petition was

On May 13, 2020, the Delhi High Court disposed of the case, Varun Khullar vs. Union of India, via Video Conferencing. This Case dealt with the implementation of Section 8, of the Persons with Disability Act, 2016.  Brief Facts of the Case  The petitioner suffers from 100% disability below the

The Delhi High Court in the case of Aadhar Gaur v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) and Ors. accepted the order passed by the Supreme Court on May 11, 2020. The order allowed the states to make the decision regarding the sale of liquor amidst COVID-19. The Public Interest Litigation

On May 11, The Delhi High Court rejected several clubbed petitions. These petitions were concerned with the overcrowding at liquor shops during the pandemic. The High Court refused to interfere and pass any order. It directed the Centre and State Government to make a suitable policy.  Reliefs sought by the

A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari on May 6 upheld the legal position that the accused can challenge his conviction in an appeal filed by the State even if he did not prefer a formal appeal in the case of