Vishal Mandal

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking directions to dissolve the Death Audit Committee. The Petitioner contests that the Data released by the Committee and the State has discrepancies.  Prayer by the Petitioner The petitioner has made these following prayers- a.) To direct the respondents to publish confirmed COVID-19

In this case, the petitioner challenged the Rajya Sabha’s Media Advisory Committee’s decision taken on 6.6.2017. Facts of the Case The petitioner is a freelance journalist. He claims to have been covering the proceedings in the Rajya Sabha as well as the Lok Sabha since 1991. The respondents claimed that

In Hansraj and Others vs State of Delhi and Others, Hansraj filed a petition in the High Court. The petition requested the granting of bail. A Single-judge bench of Justice Asha Menon heard the matter. Brief Facts A 23-year old in judicial custody filed the petition. He approached the High

The Delhi High Court, in the case of Karan Seth vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Others, ordered the authorities to conduct a Videography inspection. Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar heard the matter. Facts of the Case The non-COVID patients taking treatment were residing in the Night

On May 14, the Delhi High Court passed an order in the favour of Horlicks. The Court restrained Zydus Wellness from broadcasting the impugned advertisement. Facts of the case Plaintiffs have filed the present suit seeking prayer of a permanent injunction. They want the defendant to restrain from telecasting the

On May 15, the Delhi High Court opined against the illegal detention of the petitioner, where the state has failed to execute orders. Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Subramonium Prasad heard the case.  Facts of the case The petitioner has filed this petition as a writ of habeas corpus. He

The appellant has filed this application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appellant seeks to recall the order dated 20.04.2020. In this order, the appeal filed to the judgment passed by the trial Court was disposed of by a consent order. Facts of the Case The

On May 14, the Delhi High Court heard petitions related to the facilities provided in AIIMS. The bench of Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar heard the matter. Present Status of the Case The High Court decided to hear both the matters together. The petition filed by Mr Karan

The Petitioner is a social activist who has filed this PIL. He seeks directions from the Court for the construction workers who are denied their social welfare schemes. The Petitioner seeks implementation of the Building and Construction Workers under the Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service Act and also