On 26.05.2020, the Delhi High Court took Suo Motu Cognizance of a video. The video complained about the inadequacy of the Hospital facilities provided for COVID-19. Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar heard the matter. Facts of the Case Mr Dharmendra Bhardwaj made a video-clip which has been circulating
The Delhi High Court on 26th May 2020, held that when there are only two partners and one has agreed to retire, then the retirement amounts to the dissolution of the firm. The bench of Justice N.V. Ramana, Justice Sanjiv Khanna And Justice Krishna Murari heard the appeal. Facts of
The petitioner has filed the present PIL in view of the spike in COVID-19 cases in 48-hours. Further, the petitioner seeks to issue directions to the Central and State Government. Prayer of the petitioner The petitioner prayed for two directions from this Court: To allow more private hospitals in Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition contesting malafide intention in the bidding process of South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC). The Division Bench of Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar heard the matter. Facts of the Case The Respondent issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) for regular allotment of
On May 26, the Supreme Court took Suo Motu cognizance of problems and miseries of migrant labourers. The cognizance came in an order titled In Re: Problems and Miseries of Migrant Labourers. Background The Suo Moto cognisance comes after many activists appealed to this Court not to remain a mute
The petition is filed in the backdrop of the notices issued by the CGPDTM. The petitioner contends that it is against the orders passed by the Supreme Court. Prayer of the Petitioner The petitioner has made the following prayer- To quash the Public Notice dated 18.05.2020. Direct the respondent no.
The Delhi High Court heard a suo-moto case of ‘courts on its own motion vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi’ via video conferencing. The court granted an extension of interim bail to the Under Trial Prisoners (UTPs) for another 45 days. The writ petition was taken up according to a
The Delhi High Court in the case of Nirmal Gorana v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) and Ors, ordered to depute a senior officer to visit the Quarantine Facility. The petitioner filed a PIL contending the facilities provided to the patients. Contentions of the Petitioners The petitioner states that
The Supreme Court overruled the orders by the lower court in a matter of Section 65 and 66 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The lower court dismissed the application for proving the will by way of secondary evidence. This was an improper dismissal. Facts of the case The appellants
The Delhi High Court in the Suo-moto case of Courts on its own motion vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, ordered an extension of interim bail for the Under Trial Prisoners (UTPs). The court listed the case by way of video conferencing based on a note of the Register General
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
