Delhi High Court: The Data Published by the Death Audit Committee is Not Arbitrary or Discriminatory

Must Read

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were...

Follow us

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking directions to dissolve the Death Audit Committee. The Petitioner contests that the Data released by the Committee and the State has discrepancies. 

Prayer by the Petitioner

The petitioner has made these following prayers-

a.) To direct the respondents to publish confirmed COVID-19 cases and the deaths through a daily bulletin every 24 hours.

b.) To direct the respondents to scrap the DAC constituted by the Delhi Government. 

Arguments by the Parties

The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the number of deaths conveyed by a few hospitals. By comparison, the numbers reported by the government are lesser.  The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Government contradicted this averment. He submitted that this contention is baseless and not true.

He submitted the Central Government guidelines issued on March 15, 2020, and May 10, 2020. The government constituted a three-member Death Audit Committee (DAC) on April 20, 2020. That this committee audits and publishes the data in question. 

The member of the Death Committee are as follows:

– Dr.Ashok Kumar, Ex. DGHS – Chairperson 

– Dr.Vikas Dogra, RGSSH – Member 

– Dr.R.N.Das, MS-Nursing Homes – Member

The counsel for the respondents stated the procedure for the data relating to COVID-19 deaths. Moreover, this has to be reported by all Central, State and Private run hospitals in Delhi in a tabular form. Further, on the basis of this data and the Guidelines issued by the Central Government, DAC publishes the figure of deaths occurred due to COVID-19. Thus, the DAC has followed the guidelines of the Central Government in full letter and spirit. Therefore, there is no arbitrariness or discrimination.

Observation of the Court

The main grievance of the petitioner is the publication of incorrect data. The Court observed that the basis of the petitioner’s whole case is on presumptions. The basis for the petition are odd newspaper reports. No research backs the filing of the petition.  

The Court also stated that the data is being collected from the hospitals in a proper format. That it is under the guidelines issued by the Central Government. The Court noted that a DAC was constituted on April 20, 2020 and audits the data of COVID-19 from different hospitals in Delhi. It also opined that the members of the Committee are experts in their subject and field. 

The Court held that there seems no arbitrariness or discrimination. Further, there is no material also to show false fabrication of data published by the Respondents. 

Court’s Decision

The Court has directed the DAC and the State to do the following:

  1. Publish the data only after proper analysis.  
  2. To maintain the data in the proper manner. 

The bench of Chief Justice D.N Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan stated that the petitioner may file a petition at a later stage with proper supporting material.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Supreme Court : High Courts Have Sole Authority Under Article 226 To Decide Validity of Tax Provision, Even if Matter Is Sub-Judice Before Income...

A Full Bench of the Supreme Court held that the validity of a provision is a serious matter which could only be decided by...

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected to act without any arbitrariness...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s property, without any legal sanction...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to the fact that they were...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were directed to consider the same....

Madras High Court Reiterates That ‘Ignorance of Law’ Is Not an Excuse and Dismisses Petition by a Constable

A Constable committed bigamy and deserted his service for more than 21 days. After dismissal from his service, he moved to Tamil Nadu Administrative...

Transfer of Winding-up Proceedings Allowed Under S. 434, Restrictions Under 2016 Rules To Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

This appeal relates to the question of transfer of winding-up proceeding from the High Court (Company Court) to the NCLT.  Facts M/s. Girdhar Trading Company, 2nd...

Constitutional Court of South Africa Declares Provisions of Domestic Workers’ Injury Compensation Legislation To Be Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of South Africa in Sylvia Mahlangu v Minister of Labour , declared parts of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases...

Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC Can Be Cancelled Under Section 439(2) CrPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the right of default bail of the Accused can be cancelled under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Facts...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -