Delhi High Court: The Data Published by the Death Audit Committee is Not Arbitrary or Discriminatory

Must Read

Internship Opportunity at Jain & Partners, Delhi: Registration Open

About the Firm Jain & Partners is an IPR & Corporate law consultancy firm, which provides possible solutions to almost...

Appeal Must Be Filed Within 45 Days of Public Announcement: NCLAT

In the case of Girish Baduni vs Punjab National Bank, an appeal was filed against the order dated 20th September...

Call for Papers: Lawjustify Volume 01 Issue 02

About the Lawjustify Lawjustify is a novel platform that aims to cater to the needs of law students by providing them...

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking directions to dissolve the Death Audit Committee. The Petitioner contests that the Data released by the Committee and the State has discrepancies. 

Prayer by the Petitioner

The petitioner has made these following prayers-

a.) To direct the respondents to publish confirmed COVID-19 cases and the deaths through a daily bulletin every 24 hours.

b.) To direct the respondents to scrap the DAC constituted by the Delhi Government. 

Arguments by the Parties

The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the number of deaths conveyed by a few hospitals. By comparison, the numbers reported by the government are lesser.  The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Government contradicted this averment. He submitted that this contention is baseless and not true.

He submitted the Central Government guidelines issued on March 15, 2020, and May 10, 2020. The government constituted a three-member Death Audit Committee (DAC) on April 20, 2020. That this committee audits and publishes the data in question. 

The member of the Death Committee are as follows:

– Dr.Ashok Kumar, Ex. DGHS – Chairperson 

– Dr.Vikas Dogra, RGSSH – Member 

– Dr.R.N.Das, MS-Nursing Homes – Member

The counsel for the respondents stated the procedure for the data relating to COVID-19 deaths. Moreover, this has to be reported by all Central, State and Private run hospitals in Delhi in a tabular form. Further, on the basis of this data and the Guidelines issued by the Central Government, DAC publishes the figure of deaths occurred due to COVID-19. Thus, the DAC has followed the guidelines of the Central Government in full letter and spirit. Therefore, there is no arbitrariness or discrimination.

Observation of the Court

The main grievance of the petitioner is the publication of incorrect data. The Court observed that the basis of the petitioner’s whole case is on presumptions. The basis for the petition are odd newspaper reports. No research backs the filing of the petition.  

The Court also stated that the data is being collected from the hospitals in a proper format. That it is under the guidelines issued by the Central Government. The Court noted that a DAC was constituted on April 20, 2020 and audits the data of COVID-19 from different hospitals in Delhi. It also opined that the members of the Committee are experts in their subject and field. 

The Court held that there seems no arbitrariness or discrimination. Further, there is no material also to show false fabrication of data published by the Respondents. 

Court’s Decision

The Court has directed the DAC and the State to do the following:

  1. Publish the data only after proper analysis.  
  2. To maintain the data in the proper manner. 

The bench of Chief Justice D.N Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan stated that the petitioner may file a petition at a later stage with proper supporting material.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Internship Opportunity at Jain & Partners, Delhi: Registration Open

About the Firm Jain & Partners is an IPR & Corporate law consultancy firm, which provides possible solutions to almost...

Appeal Must Be Filed Within 45 Days of Public Announcement: NCLAT

In the case of Girish Baduni vs Punjab National Bank, an appeal was filed against the order dated 20th September 2019 which was duly passed...

Call for Papers: Lawjustify Volume 01 Issue 02

About the Lawjustify Lawjustify is a novel platform that aims to cater to the needs of law students by providing them a comprehensive learning and engaging...

ConQuest 5.0: Quiz on the Indian Constitution, Law, History and Politics by CLPR [Oct 3-18]: Registrations Open

About the Organiser The Centre for Law and Policy Research, Bangalore (CLPR) is a not-for-profit dedicated to making the Constitution work for everyone through law...

National E-Conference on Public Health Law in India by Parul University [Sep 27]: Register Now!

About the University Parul Institute of Law, Faculty of Law offers various programs in law, which was established in 1993. Currently, it caters to students from...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -