Libertatem News Network

In the case of Himalayan Vikram Singh v. Union of India, decided on 21st August 2015 by the Supreme Court of India presided by the 3-judge bench of Justice T.S.Thakur, Justice R.K. Agrawal and Justice A.K. Goel. The question before the Court was that whether Section 364A inserted in the

In the case of T.P. Cherian Phillip v. National Highways Authority of India decided by a division bench of the Kerala High Court on August 2015 upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge that the street vending is not allowed on Highways without prior permission of authority. The question

Unwanted loud sounds are a nuisance to public at large. In Bharat Shamrao Gajendragadkar v. Shri Theatre, decided on 22nd July this year, The National Green Tribunal gave a strict ruling concerning the same. Osmanabad Municipal Council’s failure to declare silence zone in the city proved to be a heavy

A fight between the ordinary passengers and the Railways had been ensuing in Sharad Kumar Jhunjunwala v. Union of India, Ministry of Railways, which finally ended in favour of the government. Itthe allegation was one of inter alia unfair, discriminatory and arbitrary practice by the Railway and IRCTC in Passenger

An appeal was filed against order passed by High Court declining to set aside criminal proceedings initiated against appellant by the respondents. The question that arose was: whether suo-moto complaint registered by 2nd respondent in Police Station of Lokayukta against appellant was without jurisdiction. It was held the second respondent,

The Supreme Court in a recent decision Central Bureau of Investigation v. Rathin Dandapat on 21st August 2015 decided in a case where the Court was called upon to decide as to whether no remand in police custody can be given to the investigating agency in respect of the absconding

The Madras High Court in a recent decision M. Chinna Karuppasamy v. Kanimozhi on 16th July 2015, while considering an interesting issue that whether a woman, against whom a decree of divorce had been passed on ground of adultery, is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of CrPC, the

The Himachal Pradesh High Court in Dushyant Kumar v. State of H.P, on 07th August 2015 while granting bail to the petitioner in a FIR filed under Sections 376 and 313 of Indian Penal Code, a bench of T.S Chauhan J., after perusal of the records decided that it cannot