Sakshi Rathore

On 8th September 2020, the Apex Court heard the case of Ashoo Surendranath Tewari v Deputy Superintendent of Police, EOW, CBI. The Bench comprised of Hon’ble Justice RF Nariman, Hon’ble Justice Navin Sinha, and Hon’ble Justice Indira Banerjee. Brief Facts The Appellant accused in the present case was an employee

The Supreme Court heard the case of Raghav Gupta v State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr. The Bench comprised of Hon’ble Justice R.F. Nariman, Hon’ble Justice Navin Sinha and Hon’ble Justice Indira Banerjee. Brief Facts The food inspector purchased a sample of Snapple Juice Drink for analysis. He concluded that

The Supreme Court heard the case of Union of India v Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India. The Bench comprised Hon’ble Justice Arun Mishra, Hon’ble Justice S Abdul Nazeer, and Hon’ble Justice M.R. Shah. Brief Facts All Telecom companies in India pay a part of their revenues as

The Supreme Court heard the case of Committee of Management Hafiz Mohammad Siddique Islamia Inter College & Anr. v State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. The Bench comprised Hon’ble Justice Ashok Bhushan, Hon’ble Justice R. Subhash Reddy, and Hon’ble Justice M.R. Shah. Brief Facts The UP Government issued an Order on

On 1st September 2020, the SC heard the case of Sarika v Administrator, Mahakaleshwar Mandir Committee, Ujjain & Ors. The Bench comprised Hon’ble Justice Arun Mishra, Hon’ble Justice B.R. Gavai, and Hon’ble Justice Krishna Murari.  Brief Facts The SC appointed an Expert Committee consisting of experts of the Archaeological Survey

The Hon’ble Supreme Court heard the case of V.N.Krishnamurthy v Ravikumar. The Bench consisted of Hon’ble Justices Arun Mishra, B.R. Gavai and Krishna Murari. The question before the Court, in this case, was whether the Appellants held the locus to question the Judgment and Decree passed by the Trial Court

On 26th August 2020, the Supreme Court heard the case of Karthick v The State represented by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu. The Bench consisted of Hon’ble Justice R. Subhash Reddy and Hon’ble Justice M.R. Shah. Brief Facts The conviction of the Appellant was under Sections 147, 323, 325, 323