Rashi Jha

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal decided on a case that was already under the Punjab state commission, the grievances known were the arrest of a debtor. The court not only understood the reason behind the detention but also didn’t find any accurate reason for intervention and accordingly disposed of the appeal. 

The Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad decided on a case where the candidate’s case was different from his community members dated June 10th, 2021.

The Central Information Commission decided on a case related to the misuse of dowry on June 11th, 2021.

A written submission dated 28.5.2021 was received by the PIO stating the RTI application was transferred to another district of the PIO on the date 24.4.2019. Here, the commission directed to mark the unnecessary transfer of the RTI application and disposed of the case.

The Central Information Commission decided on the case dated 4th June 2021, which was filed on the PIO under the RTI Act.

Aggrieved by the order dated 1.1.2019 passed by the Learned Commissioner of the Income Tax, an appeal was filed where the tribunal rejected the arguments for the Assessee.

An RTI appeal was filed in the Central Information Commission seeking the information of the letter enclosed by the CPIO.

On May 31st, 2021, the Central Information Commission decided on a case of the tender process and the misuse of the RTI Act 2005. It also observed that the reply of the CPIO was unacceptable. The Commission also directed the CPIO to sought proper information keeping in mind the nature of the RTI act. The Commission also referred to the judgment of the division bench of the Jharkhand High Court, in State of Jharkhand v. Navin Kumar Sinha and Anr., AIR 2008 Jharkhand 19 dated 08/08/2007.