Mary Lavinia

Excerpt A Petition had been filed before the Delhi High Court seeking criminal action against Twitter India and its representative. This was regarding their involvement in the conspiracy to promote the Khalistan Movement (Sangeeta Sharma vs UOI).  Brief Facts Sangeeta Sharma was the Petitioner. She had sought a direction for lodging

The Delhi High Court issued a notice in the Central Government’s review petition. This was against the order directing it to publish the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification- 2020 in regional languages. (Vikrant Tongad v. Union of India). Brief Facts Vikram Tongad had filed a petition to ensure a

Lifting its earlier order of stay, the Delhi High Court had allowed a breath analyzer test through the tube process for air traffic controllers (ATCs) in the case of Air Traffic Controllers’ Guild (India) vs UOI. Brief Facts The Air Traffic Controllers’ Guild (India) had filed a petition. It had sought

The Delhi High Court had directed news website meaww.com to take down and block its defamatory articles against the owner of NFL’s Washington Football Team, Daniel Snyder (Daniel Snyder vs Eleven Internet Services LLP & Ors). Brief Facts Snyder’s grievance proceeded towards the publication of certain “defamatory and malicious” articles.

The Delhi High Court refused to lift its stay on Sudarshan TV’s broadcast on Muslim “infiltration” in government services (Syed Mujtaba v. UOI & Ors). Brief Facts Sudarshan TV moved the High Court for removal of stay. This was in light of the Supreme Court order refusing to grant any

The Delhi High Court asked Advocate Ashok Arora, and the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), if they were open to mediation, by a retired Supreme Court judge to settle their dispute (Ashok Arora vs SCBA). Brief Facts Following Arora’s call for an Emergent General Meeting, to remove Senior Advocate Dushyant

The Delhi High Court reserved its order last week in the bail plea by Pinjra tod activist Devangana Kalita in connection with a Delhi riots case against her. (Devangana Kalita vs State) Brief Facts Devangana Kalita was accused in as many as four FIRs about the anti-CAA protests and Delhi

The Delhi High Court directed a ‘Technical Evaluation Committee’ under the Delhi Government to hold negotiations with three companies. These companies were ‘The New India Assurance’, ‘Oriental Insurance’, and ‘National Insurance’. This was to issue group Mediclaim policies for Delhi advocates under the CM Advocates’ Welfare Scheme. Brief Facts of

The Delhi High Court allowed Delhi University to add a member of its choice to the court-constituted Grievance Redressal Committee. This was in connection with the online open book examination for final-year students. (The University of Delhi vs Anupam & Ors) Brief Facts This was the result of an appeal

Contempt of court petition got charged against Oyo, its founder Ritesh Agarwal, and directors Rakesh Kumar, Anuj Tejpal in the Delhi High Court, for not submitting a list of its unencumbered assets. Brief Facts of the Case  On July 7, The Delhi High Court had asked SoftBank-backed Oyo, to file