Brief Facts of the Case The case deals with the issue of administration of the Sri Padmanabhaswamy Temple, Thiruvananthapuram. The present appeal challenges the judgment and order passed by the Kerala High Court. Therein, the High Court held that the appellant is not the “Ruler of Travancore” within the meaning
The present case is M/s. Hotel Urvashi v. Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. & Another. The Appellant is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The Appellant was a consumer of the electricity of the Respondent. On a surprise check, they found that the respondent tampered with the meter. Though
The case arises out of a family brawl. The Appellant’s husband held shares in M/s. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. He was also the shareholder in M/s Oswal Greentech Ltd. Before he died, he nominated the shares according to Section 72 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”). By the said nomination
The Applicant filed for bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. The Applicant is alleged to have committed the murder of the informant’s brother. The informant’s parents were informed that their son’s dead body was hidden in the bushes. The dead body was indeed recovered from the spot. Post-mortem was
The petitioner is an accused in a criminal case with 67 FIRs registered against him. The charges against him are under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 204 of Indian Penal Code, and Section 3 of the Haryana Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2013. The petitioner moved a
The SC heard the case of Mohd. Inam v. Sanjay Kumar Singhal and Others on the 26th of June. Brief Facts of the Case The present appeal is filed by way of an SLP. The father of the Appellant was the original tenant of the Respondent. Upon his death during
A division bench of the SC heard Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation v. Star Agriwarehousing and Collateral Management Limited & Ors. on the 24th of June. Brief Facts of the Case The case relates to a tender contract awarded to the Appellant. In the intra-court appeal, the High Court passed an
The Appellant was travelling in a bus operated by the Respondent Corporation. He met with an accident due to rash and negligent driving of the bus driver. As a consequence, the Appellant underwent amputation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.4,08,850/- to the party. In doing so,
Brief Facts of the Case The petitioner filed this revision petition challenging the charges framed against her under Section 306 of IPC. Following the marriage of petitioner and the deceased, matrimonial disputes arose. The petitioner left the deceased and started living at her parent’s house. The petitioner allegedly took 15
Brief Facts of the Case Respondent No. 1 (“Contractor”) was awarded a works contract based on a tender floated by the Government. The said contract contained a clause for reimbursement of sales tax (Central or State). Clause 45.2 entitled the contractor to the same in the said contract. Later, the
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
