Manoj Raikar

The present appeal is a challenge to the judgement by Allahabad High Court. The High Court judgement confirmed the conviction of the Appellants under Sec. 302 read with Sec. 34 of IPC, 1860 and Sec. 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. The Court found the Appellants guilty of murdering one

The Appellant had filed a contempt petition against the Respondent. That the Respondent failed to follow the directions of the Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal had ordered the Respondent to regularize and departmentalise the concerned workers in the Food Corporation of India. These workers were working through contract labour cooperative societies

The Appeal arose out of a suit for declaration filed by the Appellants. The Appellants alleged that the land owned by the Respondents was illegal. To this end, the Appellants moved an application under Secs. 65/66 of the Evidence Act, 1872 (“Act”). It sought permission of the court to produce

In this case, the dispute between the parties arose over an increase in the price of High-Speed Diesel (“HSD”). Brief Facts of the case  The “HSD” It is an essential material for carrying out the drilling operation based on a contract agreement. The contract provided for a ‘Change in Law’ clause (“Clause

An appeal before the Supreme Court arises from the decision of the Division Bench based on a writ petition filed by the Respondent against the Appellant – Bank in the case of Punjab National Bank & Ors. V. Atmanand Singh & Ors. Facts of the case The Respondent had borrowed

In the present case of Kanwal Tanuj v. State Of Bihar & Ors, the Appellant is an accused along with one Shri C. Sivakumar, CEO, Bhartiya Rail Bijli Co. Ltd., (“BRBCL”) based on FIR registered by the CBI under Secs. 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC read with

As per the facts of Quippo Construction Equipment Limited v. Janardan Nirman Pvt. Limited, the Appellant deals in the business of providing equipment for infrastructure activities and had entered into multiple agreements with the Respondent for renting out Piling Rigs. Amongst the General Terms and Conditions appended to the agreements

The doctrine of mutuality in the context of the law of taxation traces its origin in the common law principle that a person cannot engage in business with oneself and thus any amount received from oneself cannot be regarded as income and thereby taxable. The Supreme Court in the present

The primary Principle of Interpretation of Statutes is to give the word the plain, literal and grammatical meaning of the word unless it contradicts with the express intention or declared purpose of the statute. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Andhra Pradesh v. M/s Linde India