Liji Anna Thomas

The Bench consisted of Justice R F Nariman, Justice Navin Sinha and Justice Indira Banerjee held that action under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is directed to specific persons alone. Hence, all others concerned with such property are not to be taken into account as being an

A Full Bench consisting of Justice Arun Mishra, Justice B.R Gavai and Justice Krishna Murari heard the present case. Although encroachments are matters of concern, special Monitoring Committee was appointed by the Apex court, and it was said that it must not exceed its powers. Brief Facts of the Case

A Full Bench consisting of Justice B.R Gawai, Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Krishna Murari heard the case. It held that his tweets undermined the dignity and authority of the administration of justice. A Judge’s functions may be divisible, but his integrity and authority are not divisible in the context

The Division Bench consisted of Justice Naveen Sinha and Justice R F. Nariman. They held that conviction could not be based on a foundation of conjectures, nor based on probabilities alone. The stringency of the provisions requires an adequate examination of the evidence for the establishment of facts by the

A division bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice R. Subhash Reddy heard the case of Shailendra Swarup v. Deputy Director of Enforcement Directorate. The Apex Court explained that the liability for an offence under Section 68 of Foreign Exchange and Regulation Act, 1973. It depends on the role

A full bench consisting of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Ajay Rastogi, and Justice Aniruddha Bose decided the case of Erudhaya Priya v. State Express Transport Corporation. Here, the bench granted compensation to the appellant. Brief Facts of the Case The appellant was travelling from Chennai to Bangalore on a

A Full bench comprising of Justice R. F Nariman, Justice Naveen Sinha and Justice B. R. Gavai heard the case of Shiv Raj Gupta v. Commissioner of Income Tax. It set aside the High Court’s judgment for answering a substantial question of law without first formulating it. The High Court

A Full Bench comprising of Justice R. F. Nariman, Justice Naveen Sinha and Justice B. R. Gavai heard the case of Director of Income Tax v. Samsung Heavy Industries. Brief Facts of the Case The Oil and Natural Gas Company (“ONGC”) had a contract with the Samsung Heavy industries (“Respondent”).