Gautam Gupta

Introduction The court stated that the learned trial judge erroneously convicted the appellants under Section 498A/304B/34 IPC and wrongly placed the onus on an inadmissible and weak piece of evidence based on the foregoing discussion and independent scrutiny of the entire evidence on record, the statutory provisions, as well as

Introduction The Petitioner approached the court for a stay on transfer order and subsequently for a  relieving order for one year. The reasons provided for the same were to provide extra care to his wife on account of her I.V.F. technology delivery due and the doctor’s advice on special care.

Introduction The Gauhati High Court on Tuesday sought a response from the Centre and the State Government on concerns relating to the status of internally displaced individuals and their responsibilities for such people. Facts Both public interest litigations are being pursued simultaneously. The subject in both of these petitions is

The Petitioner filed for regularization of service after 10 years of service.

The Petitioner criticised the engagement of private respondent as trainee Sahayaks and requested that the APDCL authorities select and designate the Petitioner as Sahayak.

Invoking the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court of Sikkim cancelled the appointment of the Petitioner on the post of Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate due to non-disclosure of facts.

Excerpt The case over the contested assets began in 1975, when the plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest filed a Title Suit in the 1st Court of Munsiff at Serampore, seeking a declaration that the alleged deed of the sale he executed was just a mortgage and not an absolute sale. Facts of the

Introduction On or about May 21, 1996, the applicant applied Section 33C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ID Act), numbered Case No. COMP.39/96, which was decided by the West Bengal First Labour Court on May 19, 2014. The first labour court took 18

Excerpt The learned trial Judge’s conclusions cannot be defined as perverse, and there are no good and convincing reasons to revoke the acquittal of convicted persons based on the benefit of the doubt. Facts Sri Kripesh Sabdakar, the complainant, filed a written complaint with the Officer-in-Charge, Fatikroy Police Station on

Under Section 374 of the code of Civil Procedure, the accused has been sentenced to rigorous life imprisonment and will have to pay a fine of Rs.5,000. It was also proved through medical evidence that the accused has sexually assaulted the victim. Facts Due to the continuous fight between the