Ann Clara Tomy

By Ann Clara Tomy In the case of Sri Ashish Kumar Dey vs the State of Tripura&Ors., a division bench comprising of Hon’ble Justice Akil Kureshi and Hon’ble Justice S G Chattopadhyay dealt with a petition filed almost 5 years after rising of the cause of action for refund of

In the case of Shri Chandra Sekhar Sinha v. The State of Tripura & Ors., Hon’ble Justice Akil Kureshi dealt with a writ petition challenging the office of a municipal council member on the ground of disqualification due to defection. Facts Petitioner has through Public Interest Litigation under Art 226

In the case of Sri Nikhil Chandra vs State of Tripura & Ors, WP(C) No.309/2020,  Hon’ble Justice Mr Akhil Kureshi dealt with the challenge to an order repatriating deputationists to parent organization from government service. Brief Facts A memorandum was issued by the Under-Secretary of the Tripura Government to post

In the present case, Hon’ble Justice S Talapatra dealt with a petition to quash an order that denied restoration of a suit on the ground that no prayer for condonation of delay has been made and the suit is time-barred. Facts The plaintiff was unaware that her title suit had

In the case of Shri Sujit Datta vs the State of Tripura 2018, the division bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G Chattopadhayay dealt with an appeal under Section 374(2) of the CrPC from conviction by Asst Sessions Judge for an offence under Sec 366 of

In Shri Birendra Chandra Biswas vs Sri Ratan Chandra Dhar, a two-judge bench of the Tripura High Court decided on the nature and degree of evidence required to uphold an oral agreement which is not prima facie supported by string evidence Facts of the Case In August 2009, the defendant

In the case of Smt. Rumpa Debnath (Bhowmik) vs. The State of Tripura B.A. No. 71 of 2020, Hon’ble Justice Arindam Lodh decided on whether to grant bail to an accused against whom the rigour of Section 37 of the NDPS Act could not be proved. Facts of the Case 

In the case of Tutan Ghosh & Anr. vs. State of Tripura, the Hon’ble Justice Arindam Lodh decided to grant anticipatory bail, where the records showed shoddy investigation and that the petitioners were injured in the incident cited as the cause of action. Facts of the Case The petitioners/accused have

In the writ petition Smt Shipra Debnath & Ors vs State of Tripura & Ors (W.P.(C) No.1449 of 2019), Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra decided on the issue whether higher pay due to pay scale revision amounts to a career progression. Brief Facts Petitioners represented a deceased employee Mr Debnath who was initially

The Hon’ble Justice Talapatra of the Tripura High Court, in the case of Dr Bishnu Chandra Dey v. the State of Tripura decided on whether an anticipatory bail to be given to medical practitioner allegedly performing pregnancy termination without the appropriate license. Brief Facts of the Case The officer-in-charge of