World Wide Web: It’s not a restaurant’s menu card

Must Read

Explained: The Scope of Article 21 During the Era of COVID-19

“One’s right to self, their body, their health, and their livelihoods is inherent to living a meaningful human life, Human...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Solving Healthcare Issues Using Blockchain Technology

In troubled times that follow a pandemic, almost all nations are forced to take stock of the gaps present...

Follow us

Airtel, a member of the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has launched a new B2B platform named Airtel Zero which is called to be the latest anti-net neutrality programme of the Telecom Service Provider. The plan gives a platform for the app developers and over-the-top (OTT) content providers to make their application or services free for the consumer, by buying data themselves from the telecom companies. Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favouring or blocking particular products or websites.

Another plan by Airtel through which they planned to charge higher tariff for the Voice-over internet (VoIP) telephony. The company had to withdraw this plan due to criticism on social media. By this, the topic of net neutrality came in limelight in the country. COAI, which was joined by Facebook and Google, came up lobbying with the government on the passing of regulations on net neutrality. The Department of Telecom has established a six-member committee to “examine pursuit of net neutrality from public policy objective, its advantages and limitations”. A study of the economic impact on the telecom sector by the unregulated OTT services has to be done by the committee. A Consultation Paper on the same had been made public by the committee with 20 questions to be deliberated upon by the public.

The COAI wishes to implement an internet regime by which consumers would be made to pay the costs of the every service or websites they want to go through on the network over the base price which is charged as of now. This would make the internet network a kind of A-la-carte menu system by which the consumers will have to pay for everything they like to visit, thus creating the best free resource for the new start-ups a dream to look upon. Today, every start-up or for that matter, an established player too relies upon the large and pervasive internet network to promote its business. The Airtel Zero plan gives an edge to established players in the market who have the capital to buy data for their consumers unlike the start-ups. In the interview given by an Airtel official to Medianama, she commented that the new plan is non-discriminatory to all the entities who want to approach the company to buy data for making the app free for the customers. Flipkart, a well-funded marketplace venture which had linked up with Airtel over this plan, but, would start-up had been able to do so? Indeed not until it has some venture capitalists backing it up. The same had backed out of the plan due to raising hatred of the anti-net neutrality plans by the telecom operator. Also, NDTV and Cleartrip.com have also backed out from the Internet.org services, showing their support for net neutrality.

The communication app based developers have been a major worry for the telecom companies. With low priced range smartphones coming up in the electronic market users now tend to use these applications to communicate more than the conventional phones calls or text messages. The telecos’ arguments relies on this very point that so much of the financial outflows take place to establish the internet network but the OTT service providers, without any material expenses earn over their network. They also contend that the VoIP apps are affecting telecom service providers (TSPs) to a great extent and thus, should be allowed to charge them. Applications like Viber and Skype which allow free “on-net calls” have mostly affected the revenue of the TSPs of international calls and to some extent national calls too. Adding to this, WhatsApp which is the most used app in India, has also launched its voice call feature recently. Also, by improved coding and better infrastructure provided, many developers have been successful in providing Full-HD voice quality over the calls. On the other hand, the messaging service is the most affected area of revenue for the telecom companies. Messaging services by these are the most downloaded and used over the TSP’s network. Regulations a couple of years before limiting the number of messages that can be send through a SIM played an important role in increasing usage of usage of such applications.

On the other hand, telecos do generate their revenue through the usage of internet data by the consumers which comes out of usage of these applications. There is an evident increase in use by the consumers because of the fast and convenient services available through the smartphones. The percentage of the users that use VoIP services in the country is though very less in the country being the tariff of the conventional calls is very cheap. Also, the network strength in every city of the country does not support quality voice calls, resulting in users relying upon conventional calls more.

In United States of America, where there exists a large smartphone network, attempts have been made to ensure net neutrality in some aspects. The Congress tried to pass some Bills containing net neutrality provisions but it failed every time. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had issued Open Internet Order in 2010 on the broad principles of Transparency, No blocking and No unreasonable discrimination. While in Germany, the Deutche Telekom (DTAG) lost a case in court covering their intentions to throttle data speeds above a certain volume.

Concluding, if the DoT and TRAI issue orders validating the activities of the telecom operators, it would be at the first sight arbitrary on behalf of these authorities. In India, where internet access to the consumers is still growing and the SMEs who are coming up with the idea of growing using internet as a service will be affected. In the rural part of the country, internet as not entered in the lifestyles of the people as it has done in the urban part of the country, thus, it would be unfair and violating of the rights of the individuals. The telecom giants would not let a penny that they can claim to go away, and by this, it would be ensured that they make a huge increase in their revenue. The Paper which has been released by the regulatory authority has also been alleged by many of having a corporate bias behind it with providing with the arguments in their favour. On the other hand many campaigns have been started in favour of net neutrality promoting the websites such as www.netneutrality.in.  Mark Zuckerberg’s idea of Internet.org also seems to be anti-neutrality practice but its vision of the same has been very different, i.e. of providing with free services in rural areas and not of providing any fast lanes to companies.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -