We have many George Floyds, but No United Daring

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

Recently in Indian Express, a Chief Editor of Studies in Indian Politics questioned: ‘Where’s our George Floyd?’ … Answers are many. Politically as well as Legally. Floyd said:

I can’t breath and his death blasted out the violence as well as blown up a worldwide debate on racism.

However, in India, we hardly debate consistently on such issue. Many deaths have been occurred since independence on religious hatred, due to clash of castes, on account of gender bias and much more other social reasons like honour killing etc. But, our society notices it very lightly. We used to hear that in country of 1.3 billion people such things happen. Don’t take it seriously. We are like that only.

In the last month, a person named Vishnudatt Ramashankar Shahu, resident of Banda, Uttar Pradesh was having a small grocery shop in Surat area (Gujarat), reported [i] to commit a suicide, as his shop was opened till late evening on 10-5-2020 and customers did not maintain social distancing and so, Sachin, GIDC Police arrested him u/s.188 of the IPC, fined him of Rs.4,000/- and according to his family he was forced to do squatting in his society – publicly and due to such grave humiliation and loss of reputation before all the residents, he felt deep shock and he told his family that he was never insulted publicly in this manner. He ended his life by hanging on ceiling fan in an adjoining room of the house.

This was not only one such incident in the country during the lockdown since 25-3-2020. There are hundreds of such incidents, where police used to beat people with sticks on roads when they were out just to get free air. Many videos were viral for forcing youth and many other persons to do squatting in public. Police just wanted to teach a lesson to such persons that do not get out of your home; otherwise, you will not only be booked but also punished publicly by the police. No doubt, in this testing time, police is the frontline worker. Their duties are 24×7. They work very hard in tough conditions. People salute them. However, we cannot just ignore, what is not according to law.

The function of the police is to book the person, who breaks the law. But there is no legal power or any lawful authority with the police to punish the person on the spot for the alleged breach of law. All the same, police had done this in numerous cases and frequently. Supreme Court has time and again said in respect of behavior of the police in many of its judgements. In case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, the Apex Court has observed … “Arrest brings humiliation, curtails freedom and cast scars forever. Lawmakers know it, so also the police. There is a battle between the lawmakers and the police and it seems that police has not learnt its lesson; the lesson implicit and embodied in the Cr.PC. It has not come out of its colonial image despite six decades of independence, it is largely considered as a tool of harassment, oppression and surely not considered a friend of public. The need for caution in exercising the drastic power of arrest has been emphasized time and again by Courts but has not yielded desired result. Power to arrest greatly contributes to its arrogance so also the failure of the Magistracy to check it. Not only this, the power of arrest is one of the lucrative sources of police corruption. The attitude to arrest first and then proceed with the rest is despicable. It has become a handy tool to the police officers who lack sensitivity or act with oblique motive.

Law Commissions, Police Commissions and this Court in a large number of judgments emphasized the need to maintain a balance between individual liberty and societal order while exercising the power of arrest. Police officers make arrest, as they believe that they possess the power to do so. As the arrest curtails freedom, brings humiliation and casts scars forever, we feel differently. We believe that no arrest should be made only because the offence is non-bailable and cognizable and therefore, lawful for the police officers to do so. The existence of the power to arrest is one thing, the justification for the exercise of it is quite another. Apart from power to arrest, the police officers must be able to justify the reasons thereof. No arrest can be made in a routine manner on a mere allegation of commission of an offence made against a person. It would be prudent and wise for a police officer that no arrest is made without a reasonable satisfaction reached after some investigation as to the genuineness of the allegation…”

The aforesaid observation, though, in respect of Section-498A of the IPC and also Section-41(1)(b) of the CrPC, but here I am submitting the different point with regard to “on the spot punishment awarded by the Police” without any legal authority under any legislation. In fact, George Floyd was subjected to same kind of punishment severely. In India, this had become rampant during the lockdown, because, our courts are almost dormant. Large section of the people justifying the same, as they see it is deterrent for others and genuinely believes that police do have such powers. Police on the other hand always believe to have such power to penalize the wrongdoers on the spot and now, they have support of public, as people are almost silent. They never dare to say anything against Police, because they were already in fear during the lockdown and they frightened by the harsh police power. The question is: where are we marching?

The issue crop up for consideration that if suicide is due to such gross humiliation and if suicide is due to further fear of extending the lockdown for no reasons (if this is in the mind of ordinary people) and there are no means to survive and someone commits suicide or in case of death of migrant workers due to unable to reach to their homes, can it not be covered u/s.306 of the IPC: Abetment of suicide[ii]? As the abetment is defined u/s.107 of the IPC: ‘… instigating any person to do that thing, engaging in conspiracy or intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing that thing[iv]’.

The time has come to realize that when we miss the legal obligation under the law and State’s lawful omission ends the life of a human being, then, it fastens the legal liability. It is equally true that in India human life is cheap, if you are poor or nobody in the society. Everyday, at various places in different regions – people are dying unnaturally (by committing suicide or through an accidents) and no one cares. Our institutions are sleeping. Journalists do report, but after reading the same: what happens? Nothing. We are in a state of almost lawlessness, where human lives are grossly neglected and desperately ignored. Retired judges and society talks about poor, marginalized people and unprivileged persons, but in reality, neither the lawmakers nor the executors of law care for the same, much less our judicial system, who remained in almost coma for a long time. Kudos to our rule of law and glory of civilization, who lacks complete sensitivity, but the question is: in the wake of hope, how long we are going to suffer this time? At present, our existential crisis is so much that we have to forget about the civil society, civil rights and civil liberties … Thus, there are many George Floyds in our country, but we are habituated with injustice and frequent assaults on democracy… so, in our society, Truth does not always Triumph, but sometimes!


[i] News 18 Gujarati by Kirtesh Patel, Surat dated 13-5-2020

[ii] 306. If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.

[iii] 107. Abetment of a thing.—A person abets the doing of a thing, who—

(First) — Instigates any person to do that thing; or

(Secondly) —Engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or

(Thirdly) —Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing. Explanation 1.—A person who, by wilful misrepresentation, or by wilful concealment of a material fact which he is bound to dis­close, voluntarily causes or procures, or attempts to cause or procure, a thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that thing. Illustration A, a public officer, is authorized by a warrant from a Court of Justice to apprehend Z. B, knowing that fact and also that C is not Z, wilfully represents to A that C is Z, and thereby intentionally causes A to apprehend C. Here B abets by instigation the apprehension of C. Explanation 2.—Whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitate the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -