Ufa BRICS Summit: What was India’s catch?

Must Read

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

Follow us

Goldman Sachs in its publication in the year of 2001 first time ever coined the acronym BRIC to mention a new economic growth centre for the near future. By the time the developed economies realised the power of these nations, their economic structures expanded manifold. The first successful summit of Brazil, Russia, India and China in 2009 earmarked a threat to the G-7 countries. With almost the similar structure of the economies having high GDP growth rates, they went on to represent the interests of developing nations in the United Nations, World Trade Organisation and the International Monetary Fund. In the past month, the 7th Summit of BRICS was hosted by Ufa city in Russia with the agenda being “BRICS Partnership – A Powerful Factor of Global Development”.

The highlight of the summit was the signing of the Memorandum of Association of New Development Bank which is headquartered at Shanghai, China with the first Chairman of this institution being K.V. Kamath from India. Though on the record it does not says to establish a new epicentre of global economy, it clearly is an alternative for the West-led World Bank and IMF. Every other member organisation is in process to shift economic and political power of the world from the west and in the hands of the developing economies, which would not take more than a couple of years as reported by the economists. The Bank is being portrayed as a criticique of the other financial institutions in which there is an existence of veto powers and the power of vote according to their share in the capital. This defines the introduction of a new and powerful approach towards the concept of international diplomacy. With the intention is inclined towards contributing to the fast and steady growth of the developing nations, this would certainly increase the global presence of these five nations in aiding the needy and threby also fulfilling its own motives of a strong and developed economy. As far as India is concerned, this is great step towards its own development projects and would have a great impact on its ‘Look East’ policy.

The financial crisis in Greece and the lifting of the sanctions on Iran with climate change, cyber security and expansion of trade with each other too formed part of the discussions in the summit. With the annual meetings and a financial institution coming up, it is analyzed that the BRICS is slowly moving towards the formation of an organisation as against the present multilateral dialogue framework. If it takes on to form an organisation, they would be ahead of the Group of 7 countries and would be competing against the powerful EU framework. Though this not being the intention of the BRICS at this point, the nations are up for developing themselves, as the growth in the power of developing nations due to their aid would have a positive effect on their common goals.

India demanded a low ambition 10 steps project such as agricultural and railway research center from the present BRICS summit which would go ahead with making a cooperative and involving environment in the 5 nation dialogue. But there lies one issue on which India did not return with exactly what it wanted from the discussions. Previously, China had defended Pakistan over the Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi who was the mastermind behind the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The same concern has been raised by India at many different levels. India expected that this issue would be dealt specifically in the Declaration of the Ufa Summit. Due to China’s relation with Pakistan, it denied backing the same specifically and the impugned existence of the clause 36 of the Declaration remained a general criticism of the terrorist activities.

Coming on to the concluding part, what extra did India get out of this high-profile and powerful multilateral dialogue? That would be humbly answered in negative. The gains from the New Development Bank were expected in this atmosphere and all the nations had a similar catch. But non-inclusion of the United Nations 1296 Committee regarding terrorism heavily affects the objective of initiating a strong step against terrorism

Latest News

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

Delhi High Court Restrains Publication of Book on “the Ryan School Murder”

The Order had come in an injunction application filed by the St. Xavier's Education Trust in Delhi. The Plaintiff sought ad-interim restraining order on...

Supreme Court Closed Proceeding in Case of “in Re: Advocate on Record Includes a Proprietary Firm Etc.”

Brief facts of the case Emails from the Petitioner resulted in an administrative decision. An Order of the Supreme Court has drawn up the issue...

Supreme Court To Hear Female Army Officers Plea on Non-Implementation of the Permanent Commission

Claiming that its order granting Permanent Commission to women in the army’s non-combat support units on par with the male counterparts was not implemented well, many Women Army officers have approached the Supreme Court.

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -