To Share or Not to Share? The Dilemma of Sharing E-Newspapers

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

There was an effect on the distribution of newspapers due to the lockdown. E-paper is an easy way for concerned citizens to stay abreast of the latest developments.

Hence there is a rise is WhatsApp forwards of e-paper PDFs. But this is in hot debate in recent times. A recent report by local Hindi newspaper “DainikBhaskar”, which says it is illegal to forward e-paper PDFs in WhatsApp groups. Action against the group administrator in case of non-compliance is necessary. This claim came as a surprise. Amid this, another report came by the “Free Press Journal“. It claimed sharing in PDF or any other form of paper is not an illegal act. This created confusion among the readers. This led to debates on social media. The central organization of the Indian Press, Indian Newspaper Society (INS), gave a clear explanation. They said that there is no problem to circulate the PDF Files which are free. But there can be concern over copying a PDF from a paid e-paper.

Copyright Act and Information Technology Act

Newspapers have its own copyright over the content as it is their own expression. Here, it is the interplay of the interplay of Copyright Act 1957 and Information Technology Act 2000 that causes the confusion. The liability of the Whatsapp group administrator is often in highlight. But there can be no dispute over such an aspect. It has already been further settled bythe court in Ashish Bhalla vs. Suresh Chawdhary.

The Delhi HC ruled that the WhatsApp group administrator is not responsible for the content posted on the group by others. The Delhi High Court ruled that the WhatsApp group administrator is not responsible for the content posted on the group by others. It was a welcome move by HC. This is equal to making a manufacturer of the newsprint, on which defamatory statement is published, liable for defamation. Even if he or she has no hand in making that defamatory statement thus stating that no one can be then held liable
for something to which he or she has no control. In contrast to what is said by DainikBhaskar making group contender liable for this will not be a good idea.

Observations from the Act

Reading Copyright Act section 52(1) (a) (ii) & (iii) provides us with the exemption from infringing copyright. It includes a fair deal of work for the purpose ofcriticism and review. Also for reporting current events or current affairs. But the same section does provide instances advocating the newspaper authority. For example the Section 52(1)(c).

It says that certain instances will be then absolved from copyright infringement. Such as transient and incidental storage or work for providing electronic links, access or integration, where such links, access or integration has not been further prohibited by the right holder. Hence, if the e-papers come up with a disclaimer, agreeing to which it will be then downloaded; Section 52(1) (c) ceases to apply as an express prohibition.

Section 79 of the IT act talks about the exemption from liability of intermediary in certain cases, for any third party information data or communication. The social media platform in present case being the intermediary. Section 43, speaks the penalty for damages which occur by accessing or even downloading data from computer. And section 66B, it also talks about the punishment for dishonestly receiving computer resources.

But in both the sections we see the usage of words “without permission” and “dishonestly”. We see that the liability of IT act will apply to any of the member of group even if the person downloads either freely or by accepting the terms. Because both instances cannot be terms as “Dishonest practice”. But the newspaper authorities get ample scope to defend their arguments by section 81 of the Act. It states this act will not restrict any person from exercising any right under the copyright act or patents act.


Newspaper such as The Statesman or The Hindu’s e-paper comes up with its terms of not sharing this paper with anyone. They also speak that it will not apply for purpose of initiating discussion and expressing opinion. This gives scope to scope of Section 52(1) (a) (iii) of the copyright act. When the user downloads the e-paper of any newspaper which already has a term of use, the implied license ceases to apply. The user cannot circulate it. When it becomes freely downloadable copy, without any term of use, the implied license will act to the extent of even circulating it. However, there can be a debate on the extent of implied license. Hence in the present situation it is dependent on terms of use attached to the newspaper. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -