To Share or Not to Share? The Dilemma of Sharing E-Newspapers

Must Read

Explained: The Scope of Article 21 During the Era of COVID-19

“One’s right to self, their body, their health, and their livelihoods is inherent to living a meaningful human life, Human...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

The Competition Law Regime and Re-Tooling Patent Pools In India

The adversity to acquire licenses of various patented technologies can thwart the commercialization as well as the development of...

Solving Healthcare Issues Using Blockchain Technology

In troubled times that follow a pandemic, almost all nations are forced to take stock of the gaps present...

Follow us

There was an effect on the distribution of newspapers due to the lockdown. E-paper is an easy way for concerned citizens to stay abreast of the latest developments.

Hence there is a rise is WhatsApp forwards of e-paper PDFs. But this is in hot debate in recent times. A recent report by local Hindi newspaper “DainikBhaskar”, which says it is illegal to forward e-paper PDFs in WhatsApp groups. Action against the group administrator in case of non-compliance is necessary. This claim came as a surprise. Amid this, another report came by the “Free Press Journal“. It claimed sharing in PDF or any other form of paper is not an illegal act. This created confusion among the readers. This led to debates on social media. The central organization of the Indian Press, Indian Newspaper Society (INS), gave a clear explanation. They said that there is no problem to circulate the PDF Files which are free. But there can be concern over copying a PDF from a paid e-paper.

Copyright Act and Information Technology Act

Newspapers have its own copyright over the content as it is their own expression. Here, it is the interplay of the interplay of Copyright Act 1957 and Information Technology Act 2000 that causes the confusion. The liability of the Whatsapp group administrator is often in highlight. But there can be no dispute over such an aspect. It has already been further settled bythe court in Ashish Bhalla vs. Suresh Chawdhary.

The Delhi HC ruled that the WhatsApp group administrator is not responsible for the content posted on the group by others. The Delhi High Court ruled that the WhatsApp group administrator is not responsible for the content posted on the group by others. It was a welcome move by HC. This is equal to making a manufacturer of the newsprint, on which defamatory statement is published, liable for defamation. Even if he or she has no hand in making that defamatory statement thus stating that no one can be then held liable
for something to which he or she has no control. In contrast to what is said by DainikBhaskar making group contender liable for this will not be a good idea.

Observations from the Act

Reading Copyright Act section 52(1) (a) (ii) & (iii) provides us with the exemption from infringing copyright. It includes a fair deal of work for the purpose ofcriticism and review. Also for reporting current events or current affairs. But the same section does provide instances advocating the newspaper authority. For example the Section 52(1)(c).

It says that certain instances will be then absolved from copyright infringement. Such as transient and incidental storage or work for providing electronic links, access or integration, where such links, access or integration has not been further prohibited by the right holder. Hence, if the e-papers come up with a disclaimer, agreeing to which it will be then downloaded; Section 52(1) (c) ceases to apply as an express prohibition.

Section 79 of the IT act talks about the exemption from liability of intermediary in certain cases, for any third party information data or communication. The social media platform in present case being the intermediary. Section 43, speaks the penalty for damages which occur by accessing or even downloading data from computer. And section 66B, it also talks about the punishment for dishonestly receiving computer resources.

But in both the sections we see the usage of words “without permission” and “dishonestly”. We see that the liability of IT act will apply to any of the member of group even if the person downloads either freely or by accepting the terms. Because both instances cannot be terms as “Dishonest practice”. But the newspaper authorities get ample scope to defend their arguments by section 81 of the Act. It states this act will not restrict any person from exercising any right under the copyright act or patents act.


Newspaper such as The Statesman or The Hindu’s e-paper comes up with its terms of not sharing this paper with anyone. They also speak that it will not apply for purpose of initiating discussion and expressing opinion. This gives scope to scope of Section 52(1) (a) (iii) of the copyright act. When the user downloads the e-paper of any newspaper which already has a term of use, the implied license ceases to apply. The user cannot circulate it. When it becomes freely downloadable copy, without any term of use, the implied license will act to the extent of even circulating it. However, there can be a debate on the extent of implied license. Hence in the present situation it is dependent on terms of use attached to the newspaper. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -