The Trump Administration Is Working on a New Executive Order for the U.S. Immigration System

Must Read

An Analysis of the Supreme Court of India’s Decision in Saurav Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh on Reservation

Reservation is one of the debatable realities of Indian constitution. This system got its roots from the exploitations due...

Explained: The Political Crisis in Nepal

On December 20th, K P Sharma Oli, the Prime Minister of Nepal dissolved the Lower House Parliament of the...

Can the Relatives of the Husband Attract Prosecution in Case of Triple Talaq?

The Supreme Court of India has recently made a judgement. It lays down that the relatives of the husband...

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

Follow us

President Donald Trump is working on a new executive order. The idea is to erect a merit-based immigration system in the U.S. The aim is to protect the workers of the United States. The White House announced this a couple of days ago.

The announcement on the Bill 

Telemundo News Channel recently interviewed with the U.S. President. Telemundo is a Spanish language media channel. The interview revealed that Trump is working on a new executive order on immigration. This will include a “road to citizenship” for the beneficiaries of the DACA programme. Thus, soon after this interview, the White House released its statement confirming the same.


Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a United States immigration policy. The policy was a presidential memorandum. President Barack Obama had announced it in the year 2012. It grants individuals with an illegal presence in the U.S. two years of deferred action from deportation. But these are those people who entered the U.S. as minors. Moreover,  this two-year grant is also renewable, which can lend these individuals a work permit in the country. But, to qualify, the recipients must not be felons or miscreants, on record. Thus, DACA does not lead these individuals on a path to citizenship. Hence, this is contrary to the DREAM Act, introduced in 2001,

On June 18, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States thwarted Trump’s efforts to demolish DACA. The case which prevented the recession of the program for young immigrants is- Trump v. NAACP.

The Bill 

Trump, in his declaration, called the Bill “a very big”, “very good” and “a merit-based bill”. He further added that the Bill could make the people very happy with it, subsuming the DACA. “We are going to have a road to citizenship.” He announced.

Trump’s efforts have been forever controversial. His re-election pursuits are due in November. Immigration continues to be one of his ingrained, signature campaign issues. He has, for long been, striving to revise the U.S. immigration system. The President would rather have a system based on merit rather than family ties.

Trump said that he wants to negotiate and work together with the Congress on DACA. He wants to include citizenship. “A strong border security and permanent merit-based reforms”. However, the Democrats have not been very flexible with such offers. They are rigid in wanting only open borders and nothing else. The Statement by the White House clarified.

Moreover, Senator Ted Cruz has warned the Trump administration. This was against its idea to include citizenship. He claimed that the President had “zero constitutional authority” to do so. Given the background and the opposition, it would be interesting to note how it all pans out. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -