The Destine of Odd-Even Policy vis-à-vis Delhi

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

This article must be read in consonance with my previous article titled, “Restricting driving policy- The game of Odd & Even”. In that article, I tried to explain, briefly, what the policy was all about with some glimpse of its historic origin and thereafter its constant usage by many countries with their respective success rate.

The main focus of that article was to portray the game of Odd and Even in the capital city of Delhi, where AAP government decided to apply such restrictions, on the concern mentioned by WTO over the rate of pollution (air) which was considerably very high and was harmful for human inhalation. Speaking of which, faces on both the sides of the coin were read where one explains the benefits of such policy and the need for its implementation whereas the other side criticizing the policy on the belief that its implementation will lead to the chaos among the public and therefore would not be less than a failure.

Before the implementation of the policy, people were curious about the possible consequences but now we have seen the phase of its implementation and the reaction of the public on it and therefore my objective in this article shall be to present such reactions i.e. from the administrative side, from the side of experts and other political views. The article shall also ponder on the view of the Court on the same and will try to take a stand upon what should be the possible future recourse; whether such restrictions should be restricted or be given the green.

The Dawn of 2016

The dusk of 2015 and the dawn ‘16 were awaited by many eyes of the world as the day was about to be noted as a momentous one in the history of India. The restrictive driving policy was scheduled to trigger on 1st of January, 2016 and the people of Delhi NCR were to be regulated by an unprecedented law. As the concern of the administration was to curb the issue of pollution (air) from the environment, an equal amount of anxiety was present to know the reaction of public when such burdensome policy was to be imposed upon them.

Within a few days of the implementation of the policy, there are conflicting voices as to whether it is a success or a dejected failure. The primary concern of the experts was on the pollutants in the environment of Delhi. PM 2.5 and PM 10, two measures of particulate matter, have been Delhi’s most prominent pollutants, and accurate reading for these are important to measure how Delhi’s air quality has worsened over the years. The particulate concentration of PM 2.5 or the AQI value, which was ideally meant to stay below the level of 60 ppm, was vacillating around 435 to 500 and thereby making the environment unhealthy. Based on the above data, the experts opined that the success rate of the restrictive policy is very low, if not nil, as there is still a high concentration of pollutant available in the environment. Thus, the expected result of the scheme is far to achieve, instead created an extra burden on the people who are now facing the consequences. But the view of the ruling government was in contra with that of the above one. Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal stated, “I am truly overwhelmed by the response. People have achieved the impossible”. The said statement was observed after people of Delhi decided to follow the restrictive policy; speaking of which, there were considerably less number of violations which occurred. The government has challaned 66 autorickshaw drivers and also other 81 motorist who violated the scheme. One can observe that the numbers of violators were considerably very low as compared to the total number of vehicles registered in the city. It was also observed that the, “pollutants dipped by around 10 per cent on average between 8 AM and 2 PM when compared to the last days, possibly due to the odd-even restriction.”

Fate of the scheme

In the words of Chief Minister Mr. Arvind Kejriwal, “the scheme will not be permanently implemented” and he made it clear that “it may be enforced periodically when pollution level spikes”. To this we come to a few basic questions as to what will be the fate of this scheme? Whether such scheme will be a ‘temporarily relief pill’ to the underlying problem or a step towards some permanent solution?

Since the government has made its intention clear that it is going to implement this scheme periodically whenever required, this may not be a permanent solution to the issue. Anyhow, this can never be the solution as the very nature of this scheme is temporary and is only applicable on an emergency basis.

Coming to the golden question of what can be the solution, the answer to it can be, what I call, ‘developing the basics’. By saying so, I mean developing the basic factors which are so connected to the city transport system that if properly and efficiently regulated, may reduce the pain. Taxation system, reducing congestion on the road (proper regulation of traffic), use of alternative environment friendly sources of energy in vehicles etc. are a few of the approaches. Improving these basics will not be a complete final solution but shall be a step towards achieving a long term goal of well-regulated transport and thereby a clear environment.

By only reducing the number of vehicles on the basis of odd and even number plates may definitely ease the transport and traffic, but the bad transport law with poorly regulated streets cannot be ignored if long term success is aspired.

Conclusion

There can be many solutions to this issue along with many expert opinions suggesting different methods. But will that method be the required solution to curb the issue? Only its implementation in the long run can bring some clarity to the future of the scheme. Undoubtedly, any method which pursues to achieve the required goal will one day bear good fruits; the only demand is that of the time. The driving restriction policy of the Odd and Even Scheme, as one of the command-and-control policy instruments is just an attempt to escape from the shadow of the pollution levels but as already stated earlier, it cannot be relied upon, as it is just a pill to push away the disease and not a cure to it.

Since the government has very well realized the same, it now becomes the duty of the experts to provide a draft idea as to how to proceed past this Odd-Even driving restriction policy. Since the last date for the implementation of such policy was scheduled to be 15th of January, the government shall be in need for some alternate method of maintaining the pollution level in the Capital. The more the delay occurs, the greater the difficulty is created; and thereby it will become impossible to reach the original level of safety; after which, it will be no better an environment but compromise!

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -