Supreme Court: Mandatory Registration of an FIR

Must Read

Ed-Tech Companies and the Consumer Protection Act

In the present time when the whole country is getting back to normal after the wrath of the Coronavirus,...

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...
Adv. Kapil Chandnahttp://kapilchandna
Advocate Kapil Chandna, law graduate from Delhi University, is a founding partner of Chandna & Chandna Associates and is enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi in 2012. Kapil Chandna started working independently in 2014 and had represented clients all over India, securing favorable orders for his clients:- Bail (Anticipatory as well as Regular) in Cheating, Forgery, False Dowry Case, Dowry Death, False Rape Case, POCSO, Murder/ Attempt to murder, Prevention of Corruption Act, Money Laundering.

Follow us

Every person whether aggrieved or not, of an offence “committed or attempted” is expected to call or approach the police at first instance and get it reported. After the offence is reported, the police will look into allegations and identify whether the offence reported is a cognizable offence or non-cognizable offence. If the offence discloses a cognizable offence, the police is bound to register an FIR as per Section 154 of The Code Criminal Procedure,1973. If the offence reported is a non-cognizable offence, the police can register a report as per section 155 of The Code of Criminal Procedure,1973.

Cognizable offence and Non-Cognizable offences

Cognizable offence and Non-Cognizable offences are not defined in the Indian Penal Code, 1860, however, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 contains Schedule I which refers to all the offences under the Indian Penal Code,1860 and puts them into cognizable and non-cognizable categories.

The Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 section 2 states that:-

(c) ” cognizable offence” means an offence for which, and” cognizable case” means a case in which, a police officer may, in accordance with the First Schedule or under any other law for the time being in force, arrest without warrant;

(l) ” non- cognizable offence” means an offence for which, and” non- cognizable case” means a case in which, a police officer has no authority to arrest without warrant;

Generally speaking, cognizable offences are more serious in nature, therefore:-

  1. An FIR should be registered in those offences if reported,
  2. Arrest without a warrant can be made,
  3. And police can investigate without permission of a Magistrate.

Despite the clear language of Section 154 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, a question arose before the Constitutional Bench of The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari vs Govt. Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November 2013 is whether:-

“a police officer is bound to register a First Information Report (FIR) upon receiving any information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence under Section 154 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or the police officer has the power to conduct a “preliminary inquiry” in order to test the veracity of such information before registering the same?” 

Laws Discussed 

Section 154 of the Code uses the word “information” simpliciter and does not use qualified words such as “credible information” or “reasonable complaint”. ‘Reasonableness’ or ‘Credibility’ of the said information is not a condition precedent for registration of a case.

The intention of the Parliament is unequivocally clear from the language employed that mere information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence is sufficient to register an FIR.   

In Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi) the Court has held that the provision of Section 154 is mandatory. The police officer concerned is duty-bound to register the case on receiving information disclosing cognizable offence. Genuineness or credibility of the information is not a condition precedent for registration of a case. That can only be considered after registration of the case.

Does Immediate FIR violate Article 21 of the Constitution of India, leading to Arbitrary Arrest?

While registration of FIR is mandatory, the arrest of the accused immediately on registration of FIR is not at all mandatory. In fact, registration of FIR and arrest of an accused person are two entirely different concepts under the law, and there are several safeguards available against arrest. Moreover, it is also pertinent to mention that an accused person also has a right to apply for “anticipatory bail” under the provisions of Section 438 of the Code if the conditions mentioned therein are satisfied.

Joginder Kumar vs. State of U.P. & Ors., held that arrest cannot be made by police in a routine manner. “No arrest can be made in a routine manner on a mere allegation of commission of an offence made against a person. Denying a person of his liberty is a serious matter. There must be some reasonable justification in the opinion of the officer affecting the arrest that such arrest is necessary and justified. Except in heinous offences, an arrest must be avoided if a police officer issues notice to the person to attend the Station House and not to leave the Station without permission would do.”

The exception to Mandatory registration of an FIR 

These include allegations relating to medical negligence on the part of doctors. It will be unfair and inequitable to prosecute a medical professional only on the basis of the allegations in the complaint.

All that we are doing is to emphasise the need for care and caution in the interest of society; for, the service which the medical profession renders to human beings is probably the noblest of all, and hence there is a need for protecting doctors from frivolous or unjust prosecutions. Many a complainant prefer recourse to criminal process as a tool for pressurising the medical professional for extracting uncalled for or unjust compensation.

Such malicious proceedings have to be guarded against.


Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation.

If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether the cognizable offence is disclosed or not.

And the scope of preliminary inquiry is not to verify the veracity or otherwise of the information received but only to ascertain whether the information reveals any cognizable offence.

The police officer cannot avoid his duty of registering offence if a cognizable offence is disclosed. Action must be taken against erring officers who do not register the FIR if information received by him discloses a cognizable offence.

As to what type and in which cases preliminary inquiry is to be conducted will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Illustrative category of cases in which preliminary inquiry may be made are as under:

  1. Matrimonial disputes/ family disputes
  2. Commercial offences
  3.  Medical negligence cases
  4. Corruption cases
  5. Cases where there is abnormal delay/laches in initiating criminal prosecution, for example, over 3 months delay in reporting the matter without satisfactorily explaining the reasons for the delay.

This Article is written by Adv. Kapil Chandna. Advocate Kapil Chandna is a graduate from Delhi University, founding partner of C&C Associates and is enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi (2012). is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -