‘Sound’ as an Unconventional Trademark: Recognizing the value of a mark

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

The term Trademark was propounded primarily for the purpose of distinguishing the product from other identical or similar products has been defined under Section 2(1)(zb) of The Trademarks Act, 1999 which means a mark that is capable of being represented graphically and capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of others and can include shape of goods, their packaging and combination of colors. Hence, in today’s competitive world it enhances the quality of goods because it allows the consumer to identify the service or good that he prefers and to buy it to the rejection of others goods in the future.

It has led to further increase of its scope around the corners as even something unconventional as a sound for a trademark can be registered. It is a sort of trademark where sound is used as a distinctive sign through which an average consumer will perceive that the sound is exclusively associated with the goods or services of one undertaking has been theorized as a soundmark.

A soundmark is considered to be an unconventional trademark because commonly, organizations have registered words or certain logos/designs as trademarks. The suitable description can be of the Apple logo of Apple Inc. that’s registered in various countries. However, as time passed, one can by a jingle or a tune make out the product it is associated with. In another such instance the Metro Goldwyn Mayer in the beginning of their production features the lion’s roar which portrayed them making their presence felt to the public. Hence, sound plays a very vital role in identifying a good or a service, the very function of a trademark.  To understand the significance of a sound mark better, for instance, if Blackberry starts using the default ringtone of Nokia phones, that may be unacceptable to Nokia as it leads to deceptiveness and that default ringtone is what gives a certain exclusivity to the Nokia phones. That’s why a sound mark needs to be protected.

The Indian legislation explicitly lays down the need for the marks to be “graphically represented” in order to get them registered under the said Act. It is inferred from the provisions that the mark can be represented graphically when it precisely determine what the sign portrays. The graphical representation can substitute the mark used by the applicant because it represents that sign and no other. Further, it is reasonably practicable for a person inspecting the register, or reading the Trademark Journal, to understand what the trade mark is.

Therefore, since a trademark has to be graphically represented and need not be visually perceptible a sound can also be registered as a trademark wherein one is required to comply with certain requirements in order to be granted a sound mark from the registry. In the international perspective there are two major approaches that have evolved in order to set the requirements to get a sound mark registered. The provisions in UK provided that along with the description of the mark there has to be graphical representations in the form of musical notations. This ensures that the mark will be clear and precise. Whereas in USA, the description of an audio or video reproduction of the sound must be provided apart from the description of the mark. Since everybody cannot read musical notations even a layman as well can comprehend the mark. Thus, both the approaches have their own factors of favorability.

The European Court of Justice in the case of Shield Mark B v Kist  has held that certain Sieckman criteria requirements will said to be satisfied by a musical notation if it was “represented by a stave divided into measures and showing, in particular, a clef, musical notes and rests whose form indicates the relative values and, where necessary, accidentals”. India has directly borrowed this Shield Mark doctrine. The Draft Manual for Trademark Practices and Procedures states the same requirement of law on the graphic representation. The sound clip in Sonogram or CD recording is accepted. Essentially, the representation must be clear & precise & easily intelligible. For that matter, during registration to define uniqueness, the point that states on how the music was created and the notes have been used will further aid to corroborate the cause. The description of the marks should be such that it would become difficult for other sound marks that are similar to be registered.

In the year 1950, the NBC for its radio broadcasting services was the first to be granted a sound for a trademark in United States of America. The three notes that make up the chimes are G, E& C. NBC was looking for a musical cue which would gesture the end of its programs. Basically, it wished to brand itself in a sound that any listener would immediately associate with that of NBC. On August 18, 2009, the 3-note yodel of the American based internet firm Yahoo was the first sound mark to be registered in India which was represented through musical notes. It is a milestone since it has instigated the trend of granting unconventional trademarks. It has further lead to grant of a sound mark for Allianz, a German Company and Finnish Phone Company, Nokia.

The positive influence of EU and USA regimes can be seen by looking at the above developments. The Indian Trademark registry has finally recognized the value of a mark by registering a sound as a trademark. Sound may not be visually perceptible but it has been proved that it is graphically representable. With evolving times, such a widening of scope in law is anticipated. It nurtures creativity and innovation among advertisers as well when reaching out to the consumers. Keeping technological advancements in mind, the procedure when registering must be made clear and put in place for future purposes. Nevertheless, it is a welcome development as it is opening up avenues in building a brand through sound.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -