Regulating Insider Trading: An Overview

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

The Insider Trading subsists of those securities transactions wherein any person connected with the company have such confidential information though unpublished, having the tendency to impact on the company’s market price utilize such for their personal benefits. India being the 9th largest economy as the market capitalization recently exceeded U.S $ 1.6 trillion, has also recognized the detrimental impact of insider trading on the financial markets and the rights of the public shareholders. Thus, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) notified Prohibition for Insider Trading Regulations 2015 which replaced past two decades old insider trading norms, i.e.SEBI, 1992regulations.

Further, SEBI formulated an 18 member committee for framing the regulations on the basisof its member’s recommendations. This committee was headed by the Chief Justice (former) of the Kerala High Court. The recommendations have been incorporated in the regulations.To boost investor’s certainty to maintain the impetus, SEBI has been focusing on progressing and regulating the Indian Capital market. There were considerable insufficiencies in the 1992 regulations with regard to the interpretation, method of drafting and its outreach. In addition to these, SEBI introduced numerous amendments in the 1992 regulations to cover up the loop hole. Nevertheless, peer reviews were required in the old regime and stipulate a better and robust mechanism that runs parallel to the global standards to curb the insider trading.

Insider trading leads to ‘charge’ that has been extended and suggested to be listed on the stock exchange. Therefore the 2015 regime was an expansion of the 1992 regulation which was applicable exclusively for the companies listed on the stock exchange. There has been reinforcement in these regulations about the concept of who is an ‘insider’.

The domain of connected persons as per the regulations has been expanded for the purpose of including people connected with company, whether it is a contractual employment fiduciary relationship. The regulations features the constitution of ‘unpublished price sensitive information’, and if the information is available or not. Further, its definition has been enlarged applying to both, companies and securities.Provisions under the regulations are accompanied with utility laying the intention of the legislature. The specific notes help in specifyingand capturing the soul of the legislation with regard to its execution. Numerous restrictions have been placed on insider trading which includes transmission of the unpublished price sensitive information, obtainment of such information and also trading in securities while being in the possession of such unpublished information.

The dealing in securities while being inpossession of unpublished price sensitive information was prohibited in the 1992 Regulations. Thereby, the meaning of the term ‘dealing’ got replaced with ‘trading’ with regard to securities. The regulations (1992) have provided exclusions as per which the charge of insider trading would not be applicable, for the matters in case of any off market transactions done between the promoters, who have the possession of the information on the same regard, and thereby to frame conscious decision. Further, in case of any off Due Diligence, conceivement and communication of any information with regard to the transactions involving private investment in public equity and Merger &Acquisitions, subjected to certain conditions.The matters relating to Non Individual Insiders includes those individuals, in possession of unpublished price sensitive information different from such individuals who are involved in decisions based on trade, and were not involved in the possession of unpublished price sensitive information.

Instances where trade gets executed without any leakage of information or while pursuing the trading plans andrecognizing the notion of ‘Chinese walls’ with regard to enormous organizations. It is assured that the over hopeagainst any individuals who are deemed to be connected as repulsive as per the regulations. The above said provision is akin for the over hoping existing against the people conceiving a similar objective for the purpose of acquisition. These are the persons acting as per the SEBI regulations, 2011. With these, the disclosure promises as per the regulations are limited to insiders. Promoters can only be responsible for executing initialdisclosures of trading. All the promoters, directors and employers are empowered to carry the continual disclosures, in the case of the value of trade exceeds the threshold amounting to Rupees 10 Lacs, done quarterly in a year. Once the continual disclosures happen, the company shall accordingly inform the stock exchange within two trading days.

The trading plans have been a novel concept in India. The provisions have been introduced on trading plans, eventually entitles to execute the trades pursuingearly determined trading plans. A comprehensive qualification features have been made for a compliance officer. The compliance officer shall be reporting to the board of directors or the present head of the company. The purpose of compliance officer establishes the importance of his role. The added role of the compliance officer shall be responsible for monitoring and trading. The regulations, has not prescribed separate penalties. For the purpose of setting a penalty, reference drawn from the SEBI Act, 1992. Under the act, insider trading has been made punishable by invoking a penalty of INR 25 crores, a three times the profit made by the business of insider trading, or whichever is higher. SEBI can declare the violation transactions as void for the purpose of prohibiting any insider from investing or dealing in securities. In addition to it, SEBI can also order for the return of securities.

These regulations coveredan explicit horizon of people for the purpose of connected persons and also, public servants, judges, bureaucrats, e.tc who might not have any relationship on professional front with the concerned company, but they get aware about their policies and thereby, impact the company’s share. It hascreated a large set of responsibilities on the compliance officer that could be an uphill task. There might be confusions whether a person, being the director of the company shall be allowed to trade in entity. Since, trading is not allowed while being in possession of insiderknowledge. With regard to the new regulations, an individual can frame the trading plans and could get the approval from compliance officer but it gets necessary to ensure that the insider information does not get robust.

These findings recommend that the regulations have prohibited dealing in securities but also procuring of any insider information except when there is a ‘legitimate purpose’, but the ‘legitimate purpose’ has not been defined which makes it unclear and vague for which purpose, SEBI might need to clarify those issues before the rules get kicked in. There is a hope that since, the re-regulation has been ambiguously interpreted by the court in an advanced manner and periodic classification shall be issued by the market regulations.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -