Recent changes in the Indian Judiciary are justified

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

The Parliament, recently passed a Constitution amendment bill that will facilitate setting up of a commission for appointment of judges, replacing the 20-year-old Collegium system which was under severe criticism. The bill will come into force after ratification by 50 per cent of the state legislatures and this process could even take up to eight months. After ratification, the government will send it to the President for his required assent.

As most of the people have a basic idea of the Collegium system and the recent National Judiciary Appointment Committee (NJAC), therefore, the main focus of this article would be on the reasons as to why the collegium system needs to be replaced with the NJAC.
The Parliament has made it clear that the Judiciary cannot overtake the whole judicial appointments process which goes against the grain of the constitution, as rightly said by our Finance Minister, Mr. Arun Jaitley, “the effort is now to restore back what is the spirit of the original Constitution” and have checks and balances in place.

In the event so far, the self-selecting procedure, created by the judges themselves in 1993 is unique to our country. Other democracies are not worse off in the matters of judicial independence only because they have more “participatory” systems of appointment. Independence is acceptable, but it would be even better along with the touch of accountability. So far, the central issue of democratic accountability has either not been addressed, or swept under the carpet. This is the first reason why the collegium system needs to be scrapped. Furthermore, a recent Constitutional Bench judgment has created consternation wherein five judge bench of the Supreme Court held that reservation in super specialties in the faculty of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) was unconstitutional The legal profession will assess professional merit only in terms of “technical” skills.

What is disturbing is an observation in the penultimate paragraph that “the very concept of reservation implies mediocrity.” There is no nuance here, no qualification, just a bald statement. This is the judicial perception of reservation, while applying a 63-year-old Constitution which has affirmative action written into it.

The High Court Chief Justices have occupied their positions for as little as three to six months en route to the Supreme Court. Little concern has been shown for the effect that these short-term appointments have on administration in the High Courts. Our constitution states that the executive will appoint the judges of the Supreme Court and high courts after ‘consulting’ from the judiciary and not the other way round as per article 124 and 217. Under the Collegium system the judges used to appoint other judges and the government could merely ‘object’ to their nominations. Hence, there was a need to introduce NJAC bill to end such usurpation of powers.

There were accusations being made by the eminent personalities which opines that the Judiciary was not consulted while framing the constitution of NJAC to which clearance has been given regarding the paramount powers of the Parliament in framing new laws and introducing constitutional amendments as well as the Judiciary’s scope for raising objections has been granted to them in case of some loopholes being excavated. Further another such contention raised in against objectifies the NJAC role in undermining the role of Judiciary in the appointment and transfer of judges. It was argued that since NJAC is itself six member panel out of which one will be the CJI and remaining to be senior most SC Judges and in case any two members object to nomination, the matter shall not be pursued further.

The concept of separation of power couldn’t be justified in the judicial appointments as it has been considered as the intrusion of executive which is ‘unacceptable’. But one fails to understand that this democratic structure is about giving supremacy in the hands of the elected representatives. This appointment shall also not to be considered as the intrusion as the judiciary while appointing, could have situation where the person has been appointed not because of his ability to perform but the reputation he carries with it. In such circumstances it would be apt if some other organ would be provided with the responsibility of appointment as there are more chances that such appointment would be free of any biases or prejudices which NJAC provides.

The NJAC may appoint 68% of SC judges and 80% of the HC judges in the next 5 years. It may not be the best thing to happen to judicial appointments, but the sight is better than the opaque collegium system. We can fix the warts once they are visible. Parliament can always fix what is broken, but right now it is the collegium system that is broken and not the NJAC.

Latest News

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -