Prudence, righteousness and Iraq Invasion: Chilcot Committee Report on the War

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

It took Chilcot Committee seven years to come up with it’s report, a year more than the time for which the British troops had stayed in Afghanistan. The report is a voluminous one, containing 2.6 million words in total, put in 12 volumes. Not to anyone’s (except for Mr. Tony Blair’s) surprise, the report states the Iraq invasion as unwarranted, though refraining from forthrightly terming it as “illegal”. The report might seem to bring into focus what we are already aware of, that the invasion was a big mistake. However, the report raises a larger question, which I believe is about the admittance of guilt. This point of view has become extremely crucial for there is still reluctance among the then leadership to accept that the war was nothing more than a mistake.

Much before the Sir John Chilcot Committee Report on the Iraq invasion was released, the remorse over the Iraq invasion by the combined forces of the United States of America, United Kingdom, Australia and Poland was already widespread. The report, in a sense, only confirms all the criticisms, miscalculations and voices of the bereaved victims of the Iraq debacle, the repercussions of which are being felt today by a population larger than that affected immediately by the invasion. The prominent consequence of the Iraq invasion, rise of the Islamic State or the Daesh (a derogatory term for the Islamic State in the region) is something which the Western powers, besides their allies, undoubtedly regret the most; with immense loss of life and property, with little signs of it abetting in the near future. Every day is a manifestation of its growing ideological influence, the recent one being Bangladesh.

Before we move on to see what the report contains, I think it is crucial to identify the key stakeholders, viz., citizens of Iraq, the troops of the forces (which I think need to be kept at an almost equal pedestal to the citizens of Iraq), the taxpayers of the invading nations and extending the stake involved to the people of the regions which are affected by the rise of the Daesh. No doubt, the consequences have had uncompromising repercussions and continue to do so.

The Committee’s report, with its focus exclusively on the     mental status of the leadership who decided to invade a sovereign nation, clearly establishes with proper evidence that the invasion was certainly a gross miscalculation. Even before we ponder over the findings of the report, an invasion into sovereign nation’s affairs, without any reliable evidence seems nothing but whimsical and fancy, a mindless pursuit only to cause further damage than seeking to control some. Unfortunately, all of this is quite evidently confirmed through the report.

“We will be with you, whatever”, were the words of the then Prime Minister of Britain Tony Blair to the then US President George Bush. This clearly reflects that Tony Blair was ready to put everything and was ready to go to any length towards Iraq. I don’t think it would be appropriate to dismiss the words merely as a friendly gesture and that they appear in the aftermath of 9/11 attacks. These words also connote that Blair was ready to put up everything for what the US stood, and perhaps it really did not matter if his being convinced of the circumstances really did matter. It seems that even if the UK had the slightest doubt, it would march alongside the US and other invading nations. This brings into light the kind of intelligence which was supplied about the existence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), biological weapons and chemical weapons. The intelligence was not powerful and compelling enough, as the report notes, to propel and warrant nothing less than an invasion. Perhaps it was irrelevant. UK was going to join the invading forces anyway.

The idea of acknowledging something is great and perhaps the inception of any kind of justice itself. Though the context is different, yet I wish to mention an eloquent speaker and Indian Parliamentarian, Dr. Shashi Tharoor’s words, when at a recent debate at the Oxford Union he ended his speech with the words surrounding the idea that the question is not how much Britain owes to India for colonizing and plundering its wealth, but coming to a conclusion that it does owe it. His focus was on as to how acknowledging existence of something was way more important than anything. In this light, it is time and again pertinent to note former British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s response to the recently released Chilcot Committee report, who still has a strong conviction that whatever he did was correct. He further adds that if he were to take a similar decision today, he would go for it, and takes the umbrella of the intelligence which was provided to him at that point of time. This however raises eyebrows given that his purpose was to somehow get Britain involved into Iraq, which also led to 179 British soldiers losing their lives. Certain voices have been raised demanding accountability for the loss of British lives. Millions of Iraqi lives were lost besides these, for whom the voices demanding establishment of accountability appear a little vociferous.

The report however does not explicitly term the invasion as ‘illegal’, yet does state that the basis for invasion was “far from satisfactory”, and evidently so. It is further saddening that the war was never condemned by the UN, while the reason for silence is perhaps pretty obvious. Moreover, the invasion was in a way legitimized by the subsequent Security Council resolutions. Also, in the absence of declaration of the invasion as “illegal”, everything remained a far dream. Given the countries involved, it was never to be expected that the war would be met with open condemnation from the other powerful nations. Anyway, as things folded out, the invasion turned out to be nothing more than a gross mistake whose consequences are felt to this day. Even though Mr. Blair claims that Arab spring would have eventually struck Iraq as well, certainly, it would not have fuelled the rise of Daesh, the reason being that in the aftermath of the war, the allies, in a haphazard fashion removed all the Sunnis from the power, creating a sectarian divide which is a crucial factor behind the rise of Daesh. Some prudence and calculations would have definitely avoided huge costs that were incurred as its consequence.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -