Peace Deal With The NSCN-IM: A Historic Beginning

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

On August, 3, 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, signed a historic peace agreement with the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland. The agreement has taken place between the NSCN-IM and the Government of India, headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Shri Rajnath Singh and the National Security Advisor Ajit Doval. This agreement has been made almost after 60 years after the NNC or the National Naga Council declared its independence on August 14, 1947. The terms and conditions of the peace agreement have to be made public. The Government officials have promised to make public the terms of agreement only once it has been presented in the Parliament.

The NSCN-IM or the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland, was formed in the year 1980 succeeding its ancestor the NNC or the Naga National Council, which was initially formed in the late 1940’s in order to achieve a sovereign Naga state. Their utmost aim was to cease Naga-land from the authority of the Government of India and declare it as a separate sovereign state. The NNC ceased to exist soon after it signed the Shillong Accord with the then Government of India, headed by Smt. Indira Gandhi, whereas the pact was signed under the leadership and steps of the then Governor of Nagaland, Lallan Prasad Singh. The Shillong Accord initially led to surrendering of arms and rebel instincts in the north Eastern Regions (which were then under the influence of the NNC), but later, the Shillong Accord proved be a failure as this led the participants and rebels in the NNC to lose faith in the NNC and this subsequently led to the formation of the NSCN-IM.

The NSCN-IM too aimed at liberating the area and declaring it as a sovereign state. The NSCN-IM has been an important and crucial aspect of the political agenda pertaining to North-Eastern India, both Nationally and Internationally because NSCN-IM has been doubted of receiving aid from foreign hands like Pakistan and China (mainly to supply them arms and training). The NSCN-IM not only revolves around the internal politics of India but also concerns the South-Asian countries neighboring India. The NSCN-IM has also developed contacts with the UN Human Rights Organization, Geneva, the UN unrepresented people’s Organization (UNPO) and the UN working group on indigenous people.

The cry for a sovereign state by the Nagas or any other tribal or local community in a particular state has been balanced through the means of granting them a ‘special status.’ In fact, this is the strategic idea that the modern day government has been adopting to put a cap on such absolute demands by any particular tribe or community through a series of checks and balances. Needless to say, a demand for sovereignty also calls for absolute freedom and authority within one’s own hands, state which will create serious issues for the particular governing state. Even such groups such as the NSCN-IM are aware that according to the present strategies of the state, absolute sovereignty and independence is unachievable but what they need right now is the identity and respect for the uniqueness of their tribe and the recognition of their culture and traditions. The Indian Constitution also contains “special provisions” for certain States and regions. Article 371(A) ensures that “religious or social practices of the Nagas“, “Naga customary law and procedure” and “ownership and transfer of land and its resources” is protected. The arena of defense, international relations and finance, all three major components are being governed by the Indian Government, while the rest (as mentioned above) are dealt internally by the Nagas and their leaders.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is not the first one to take steps towards the situation in Nagaland. Former Prime Minister of India, Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee, also initiated such dialogues with the people of Nagaland, and NSCN-IM and recognized the “unique history” of the Nagas, while admitting that mistakes had been committed in the past with respect to such a vast community in India. Back then, the former Prime Minister also acknowledged the jawans from Nagaland who had sacrificed their lives during the Kargil war, a fact which itself was reflective of their love for the nation, just like any other Indian. Hence it would be fair to say that Narendra Modi is doing what was earlier left undone with respect to the Naga community. The purpose of having a dialogue with the community and meeting their demands will ultimately go a long way of ensuring the achievement of  their peace and satisfaction with the government of India.

R.N. Ravi, the negotiator with the Naga Community on behalf of the Government of India (the Modi Government, to be precise) stated that, “The agreement will restore the pride of the Naga people and their dignity. Their linguistic traditions will also be promoted. It is only because of misunderstandings that we have been fighting”. How much the Government now does for this issue cannot be ascertained at the moment. Once the issue is presented and debated in the Parliament, only then the future of the Naga community can be accurately predicted. Another official of the Government says, ‘but ensuring it delivers a historic closure to the Naga insurgency will rest on how nimble we are in addressing the many problems that will surface in coming months, especially challenges from rival insurgents’. This implies that the center has to be firm in taking stands with respect to any agitation raised by not just the Naga Community but any other such groups, asany action of suppression might lead to a major setback to the peace attempts taken by the government.

The government has to ensure that it keeps peace terms with the Naga community and further make sure that both the community and the government continue to maintain a proper dialogue with each other. The NSCN (IM) general secretary ThMuivah has acknowledged the present move taken by the center and appreciates it as being the first move by the government in peaceful terms without the use of military against the Naga community. But he also added, ‘If the Government of India respects the rights of the Nagas, Nagas can come closer to India, otherwise there can be no meeting point. Therefore, sovereignty of Nagas has to be worked out’. At the present time, this debate seems to have created a political deadlock as neither the center will propose to give absolute sovereignty and power to the Naga people headed by the NSCN-IM, rather it will aim at the usual notion of ‘peaceful arrangement’ of checks and balances by giving them relief ‘to an extent’, nor the Naga community headed by the NSCN will take a back-stand, as it will continue to draw the attention of the center towards the grant of a sovereign status.

What will be the ultimate result of this peace agreement can only be adjudicated upon once the agreement is presented in the Parliament and the debates related to the issue of the Naga community further take place. This will undoubtedly open many new horizons of hope for a better Naga community and the step taken by the Government is commendable in this regard, even though the actual outcome is yet to be known. The next move taken by the Government with respect to the issue would prove to be a very crucial one indeed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Supreme Court Asks Petitioner to Approach Bombay High Court in PIL for CBI Probe in Disha Salian Case

On the 26th of October 2020, the Apex Court heard the PIL praying for a CBI probe into the death of Disha Salian. The...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -