Peace Deal With The NSCN-IM: A Historic Beginning

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

On August, 3, 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, signed a historic peace agreement with the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland. The agreement has taken place between the NSCN-IM and the Government of India, headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Shri Rajnath Singh and the National Security Advisor Ajit Doval. This agreement has been made almost after 60 years after the NNC or the National Naga Council declared its independence on August 14, 1947. The terms and conditions of the peace agreement have to be made public. The Government officials have promised to make public the terms of agreement only once it has been presented in the Parliament.

The NSCN-IM or the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland, was formed in the year 1980 succeeding its ancestor the NNC or the Naga National Council, which was initially formed in the late 1940’s in order to achieve a sovereign Naga state. Their utmost aim was to cease Naga-land from the authority of the Government of India and declare it as a separate sovereign state. The NNC ceased to exist soon after it signed the Shillong Accord with the then Government of India, headed by Smt. Indira Gandhi, whereas the pact was signed under the leadership and steps of the then Governor of Nagaland, Lallan Prasad Singh. The Shillong Accord initially led to surrendering of arms and rebel instincts in the north Eastern Regions (which were then under the influence of the NNC), but later, the Shillong Accord proved be a failure as this led the participants and rebels in the NNC to lose faith in the NNC and this subsequently led to the formation of the NSCN-IM.

The NSCN-IM too aimed at liberating the area and declaring it as a sovereign state. The NSCN-IM has been an important and crucial aspect of the political agenda pertaining to North-Eastern India, both Nationally and Internationally because NSCN-IM has been doubted of receiving aid from foreign hands like Pakistan and China (mainly to supply them arms and training). The NSCN-IM not only revolves around the internal politics of India but also concerns the South-Asian countries neighboring India. The NSCN-IM has also developed contacts with the UN Human Rights Organization, Geneva, the UN unrepresented people’s Organization (UNPO) and the UN working group on indigenous people.

The cry for a sovereign state by the Nagas or any other tribal or local community in a particular state has been balanced through the means of granting them a ‘special status.’ In fact, this is the strategic idea that the modern day government has been adopting to put a cap on such absolute demands by any particular tribe or community through a series of checks and balances. Needless to say, a demand for sovereignty also calls for absolute freedom and authority within one’s own hands, state which will create serious issues for the particular governing state. Even such groups such as the NSCN-IM are aware that according to the present strategies of the state, absolute sovereignty and independence is unachievable but what they need right now is the identity and respect for the uniqueness of their tribe and the recognition of their culture and traditions. The Indian Constitution also contains “special provisions” for certain States and regions. Article 371(A) ensures that “religious or social practices of the Nagas“, “Naga customary law and procedure” and “ownership and transfer of land and its resources” is protected. The arena of defense, international relations and finance, all three major components are being governed by the Indian Government, while the rest (as mentioned above) are dealt internally by the Nagas and their leaders.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is not the first one to take steps towards the situation in Nagaland. Former Prime Minister of India, Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee, also initiated such dialogues with the people of Nagaland, and NSCN-IM and recognized the “unique history” of the Nagas, while admitting that mistakes had been committed in the past with respect to such a vast community in India. Back then, the former Prime Minister also acknowledged the jawans from Nagaland who had sacrificed their lives during the Kargil war, a fact which itself was reflective of their love for the nation, just like any other Indian. Hence it would be fair to say that Narendra Modi is doing what was earlier left undone with respect to the Naga community. The purpose of having a dialogue with the community and meeting their demands will ultimately go a long way of ensuring the achievement of  their peace and satisfaction with the government of India.

R.N. Ravi, the negotiator with the Naga Community on behalf of the Government of India (the Modi Government, to be precise) stated that, “The agreement will restore the pride of the Naga people and their dignity. Their linguistic traditions will also be promoted. It is only because of misunderstandings that we have been fighting”. How much the Government now does for this issue cannot be ascertained at the moment. Once the issue is presented and debated in the Parliament, only then the future of the Naga community can be accurately predicted. Another official of the Government says, ‘but ensuring it delivers a historic closure to the Naga insurgency will rest on how nimble we are in addressing the many problems that will surface in coming months, especially challenges from rival insurgents’. This implies that the center has to be firm in taking stands with respect to any agitation raised by not just the Naga Community but any other such groups, asany action of suppression might lead to a major setback to the peace attempts taken by the government.

The government has to ensure that it keeps peace terms with the Naga community and further make sure that both the community and the government continue to maintain a proper dialogue with each other. The NSCN (IM) general secretary ThMuivah has acknowledged the present move taken by the center and appreciates it as being the first move by the government in peaceful terms without the use of military against the Naga community. But he also added, ‘If the Government of India respects the rights of the Nagas, Nagas can come closer to India, otherwise there can be no meeting point. Therefore, sovereignty of Nagas has to be worked out’. At the present time, this debate seems to have created a political deadlock as neither the center will propose to give absolute sovereignty and power to the Naga people headed by the NSCN-IM, rather it will aim at the usual notion of ‘peaceful arrangement’ of checks and balances by giving them relief ‘to an extent’, nor the Naga community headed by the NSCN will take a back-stand, as it will continue to draw the attention of the center towards the grant of a sovereign status.

What will be the ultimate result of this peace agreement can only be adjudicated upon once the agreement is presented in the Parliament and the debates related to the issue of the Naga community further take place. This will undoubtedly open many new horizons of hope for a better Naga community and the step taken by the Government is commendable in this regard, even though the actual outcome is yet to be known. The next move taken by the Government with respect to the issue would prove to be a very crucial one indeed.

Latest News

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

Supreme Court Upheld “Environmental Rule of Law” in NGT Decision to Demolish Illegal Hotel on Forest Land

This case concerns the dispute relating to the additional construction of hotel-cum-restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex along with a bus stand and...

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner. This writ is filed by...

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -